PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDIV vs. UDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDIV vs. UDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) and Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDIV achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than UDIV's 13.99% return. Over the past 10 years, DDIV has underperformed UDIV with an annualized return of 10.06%, while UDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.75% annualized return.


DDIV

1D
1.03%
1M
-0.40%
YTD
8.45%
6M
6.85%
1Y
22.50%
3Y*
20.89%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
10.06%

UDIV

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.61%
YTD
13.99%
6M
13.60%
1Y
31.69%
3Y*
23.72%
5Y*
14.35%
10Y*
11.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDIV vs. UDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDIV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF
8.45%12.23%27.18%9.95%-12.44%39.96%-3.59%32.40%-16.50%11.31%
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
13.99%19.00%25.61%25.21%-15.00%19.66%5.54%24.60%-8.83%17.44%

Correlation

The correlation between DDIV and UDIV is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016

0.70

The correlation between DDIV and UDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DDIV vs. UDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDIV
UDIV

Energy

27.0%
3.3%

Financial Services

22.2%
11.3%

Real Estate

15.4%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
5.4%

Industrials

6.4%
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
8.7%

Utilities

5.2%
3.1%

Healthcare

4.0%
7.1%

Basic Materials

3.0%
0.8%

Communication Services

2.8%
10.2%

Technology

1.0%
40.3%

Energy

DDIV
27.0%
UDIV
3.3%

Financial Services

DDIV
22.2%
UDIV
11.3%

Real Estate

DDIV
15.4%
UDIV
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

DDIV
7.6%
UDIV
5.4%

Industrials

DDIV
6.4%
UDIV
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DDIV
5.4%
UDIV
8.7%

Utilities

DDIV
5.2%
UDIV
3.1%

Healthcare

DDIV
4.0%
UDIV
7.1%

Basic Materials

DDIV
3.0%
UDIV
0.8%

Communication Services

DDIV
2.8%
UDIV
10.2%

Technology

DDIV
1.0%
UDIV
40.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDIV vs. UDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDIV
DDIV Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
DDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

UDIV
UDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
UDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
UDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDIV vs. UDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) and Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDIVUDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.46

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

3.77

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.34

16.60

-9.26

DDIV vs. UDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the UDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDIV and UDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDIV vs. UDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDIV drawdown since its inception was -47.56%, which is greater than UDIV's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDIV and UDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDIVUDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.56%

-35.21%

-12.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-8.44%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-19.19%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.10%

-23.18%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.56%

-35.21%

-12.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-1.56%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

-4.63%

-1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

1.91%

+1.16%

Volatility

DDIV vs. UDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) is 3.10%, while Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that DDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDIVUDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

4.77%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.65%

9.82%

+1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.39%

12.54%

+1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.54%

15.61%

+2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.92%

16.30%

+3.62%

DDIV vs. UDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDIV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than UDIV's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDIV vs. UDIV - Dividend Comparison

DDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than UDIV's 1.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DDIV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF
1.59%1.94%2.22%3.18%3.60%2.43%2.63%2.93%3.27%0.00%0.00%
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
1.10%1.53%2.05%1.91%3.20%2.97%2.90%3.40%3.74%3.47%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDIV and UDIV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UDIV has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to DDIV (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDIV dropped -47.56% vs UDIV's -35.21%.

On 10-year performance, UDIV leads with 11.75% vs 10.06% for DDIV. On fees, UDIV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, DDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UDIV has performed better with a 11.75% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UDIV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DDIV.

DDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 1.10% for UDIV.

DDIV is categorized as Momentum, while UDIV is Dividend. DDIV tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Dividend Yield Index, while UDIV tracks Linked Morningstar US Dividend Enhanced Select Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DDIV and 0.06% for UDIV.

UDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDIV and UDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer