PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDIV vs. DVLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDIV vs. DVLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF (DVLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDIV achieves a 13.74% return, which is significantly lower than DVLU's 14.88% return.


DDIV

1D
-0.34%
1M
3.53%
6M
10.64%
YTD
13.74%
1Y
25.77%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
10.05%
ALL TIME*
9.19%

DVLU

1D
-0.21%
1M
3.84%
6M
14.17%
YTD
14.88%
1Y
39.38%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$868.02K$511.47K$301.15K
$170.37K$162.91K$199.84K

DDIV vs. DVLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DDIV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF
13.74%12.23%27.18%9.95%-12.44%39.96%-3.59%32.40%-17.96%
DVLU
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF
14.88%23.67%13.36%18.84%-9.73%41.67%-6.68%33.59%-24.03%

Correlation

The correlation between DDIV and DVLU is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2018

0.85

The correlation between DDIV and DVLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDIV vs. DVLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DDIV
DDIV Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

DVLU
DVLU Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DDIV vs. DVLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF (DVLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDIVDVLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.40

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

3.07

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.07

11.19

-3.13

DDIV vs. DVLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the DVLU Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDIV and DVLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDIV vs. DVLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDIV drawdown since its inception was -47.56%, smaller than the maximum DVLU drawdown of -53.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDIV and DVLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDIVDVLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.56%

-53.26%

+5.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-12.24%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-24.86%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.10%

-24.86%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.54%

-1.39%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-8.61%

+2.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

3.35%

-0.28%

Volatility

DDIV vs. DVLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) is 3.64%, while First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF (DVLU) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that DDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DVLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDIVDVLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

4.18%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.40%

11.98%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.42%

16.47%

-2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.25%

21.13%

-2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.90%

25.60%

-5.70%

DDIV vs. DVLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDIV and DVLU have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

DDIV vs. DVLU - Dividend Comparison

DDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than DVLU's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DDIV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF
1.53%1.94%2.22%3.18%3.60%2.43%2.63%2.93%3.27%
DVLU
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF
0.66%0.73%1.06%1.34%2.18%1.33%1.34%1.71%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDIV and DVLU have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DVLU has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to DDIV (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDIV dropped -47.56% vs DVLU's -53.26%.

On 5-year performance, DVLU leads with 12.91% vs 11.83% for DDIV. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, DDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DVLU has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 11.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DDIV and DVLU have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

DDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.66% for DVLU.

DDIV tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Dividend Yield Index, while DVLU tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Value Index.

DVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDIV and DVLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer