DBJP vs. ASHS

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF) and ASHS (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index, while ASHS is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBJP returned 16.44%/yr vs 2.21%/yr for ASHS. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DBJP charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASHS.

Performance

DBJP vs. ASHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBJP achieves a 17.99% return, which is significantly higher than ASHS's 4.28% return. Over the past 10 years, DBJP has outperformed ASHS with an annualized return of 16.44%, while ASHS has yielded a comparatively lower 2.21% annualized return.

DBJP

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: -2.77%
• 6M: 11.32%
• YTD: 17.99%
• 1Y: 44.05%
• 3Y*: 27.19%
• 5Y*: 21.51%
• 10Y*: 16.44%
• ALL TIME*: 13.89%

ASHS

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: -12.76%
• 6M: -3.61%
• YTD: 4.28%
• 1Y: 30.43%
• 3Y*: 9.85%
• 5Y*: 1.33%
• 10Y*: 2.21%
• ALL TIME*: 5.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF	$307.89K	$587.40K	$590.59K
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF	$2.65M	$4.86M	$4.82M

DBJP vs. ASHS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF	17.99%	29.51%	25.53%	36.21%	-4.19%	13.04%	10.53%	20.87%	-14.82%	21.24%
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF	4.28%	39.48%	2.68%	-10.03%	-24.78%	17.66%	28.22%	24.53%	-35.91%	7.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DBJP and ASHS is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.23
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2014	0.28

The correlation between DBJP and ASHS shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (3 years) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DBJP vs. ASHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DBJP	ASHS
Technology	24.9%	31.6%
Industrials	22.8%	16.8%
Financial Services	17.6%	6.4%
Consumer Cyclical	11.2%	5.4%
Communication Services	8.1%	1.1%
Healthcare	5.3%	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	1.9%
Basic Materials	3.1%	16.8%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.6%
Utilities	1.0%	2.5%
Energy	0.8%	2.4%

Return for Risk

DBJP vs. ASHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DBJP

DBJP Risk / Return Rank: 88
DBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
DBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 86
DBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
DBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 90

ASHS

ASHS Risk / Return Rank: 44
ASHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
ASHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ASHS Omega Ratio Rank: 41
ASHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
ASHS Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DBJP vs. ASHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DBJP	ASHS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	1.15	+1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	1.66	+1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.20	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.26	1.75	+2.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.59	5.21	+9.39

DBJP vs. ASHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBJP Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the ASHS Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBJP and ASHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DBJP vs. ASHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBJP drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, smaller than the maximum ASHS drawdown of -69.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBJP and ASHS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBJP	ASHS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.30%	-69.90%	+38.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.39%	-17.46%	+7.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.50%	-34.13%	+12.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.50%	-47.81%	+26.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.30%	-47.81%	+16.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.73%	-39.81%	+33.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.25%	-48.36%	+41.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	5.86%	-2.83%

Volatility

DBJP vs. ASHS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) is 6.44%, while Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) has a volatility of 11.87%. This indicates that DBJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBJP	ASHS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.44%	11.87%	-5.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.97%	21.21%	-5.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.02%	26.63%	-6.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.25%	27.12%	-7.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.26%	25.87%	-6.61%

DBJP vs. ASHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBJP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHS's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBJP vs. ASHS - Dividend Comparison

DBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, while ASHS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.69%	0.65%	1.90%	0.76%	0.43%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	8.34%
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF	1.29%	2.81%	2.80%	5.21%	0.80%	2.30%	2.53%	2.56%	3.87%	2.07%	1.13%	5.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBJP and ASHS in my portfolio?

DBJP and ASHS have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBJP or ASHS?

ASHS has higher volatility (11.87%) compared to DBJP (6.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBJP dropped -31.30% vs ASHS's -69.90%.

Which ETF is better, DBJP or ASHS?

On 10-year performance, DBJP leads with 16.44% vs 2.21% for ASHS. On fees, DBJP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DBJP has been the lower-risk option at 6.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DBJP or ASHS?

Over the 10-year period, DBJP has performed better with a 16.44% return vs 2.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBJP or ASHS?

DBJP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DBJP or ASHS?

DBJP has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.00% for ASHS.

What is the main difference between DBJP and ASHS?

DBJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while ASHS is China Equities. DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index, while ASHS tracks CSI 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DBJP and 0.65% for ASHS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.