DBEM vs. EMDV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DBEM (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF) and EMDV (ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - DBEM tracks the MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index while EMDV tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBEM returned 10.73%/yr vs 2.64%/yr for EMDV. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBEM charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for EMDV.

Performance

DBEM vs. EMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEM achieves a 32.18% return, which is significantly higher than EMDV's 1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEM has outperformed EMDV with an annualized return of 10.73%, while EMDV has yielded a comparatively lower 2.64% annualized return.

DBEM

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 10.58%
• YTD: 32.18%
• 6M: 34.98%
• 1Y: 64.04%
• 3Y*: 25.82%
• 5Y*: 9.74%
• 10Y*: 10.73%

EMDV

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 1.17%
• 6M: 1.13%
• 1Y: 7.88%
• 3Y*: 2.77%
• 5Y*: -3.15%
• 10Y*: 2.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEM vs. EMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF	32.18%	30.42%	10.61%	10.53%	-17.00%	-2.26%	18.12%	16.77%	-10.81%	27.10%
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	1.17%	11.90%	0.06%	-1.03%	-18.19%	1.11%	-0.09%	14.93%	-7.52%	26.98%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEM and EMDV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2016	0.77

The correlation between DBEM and EMDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DBEM vs. EMDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DBEM	EMDV
Technology	36.4%	22.5%
Financial Services	19.6%	24.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	6.2%
Industrials	7.6%	6.2%
Communication Services	7.0%	6.2%
Basic Materials	6.6%	1.9%
Energy	4.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	16.4%
Healthcare	2.9%	8.2%
Utilities	2.1%	8.3%
Real Estate	1.1%	-

Return for Risk

DBEM vs. EMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEM

DBEM Risk / Return Rank: 93
DBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
DBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
DBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 93
DBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
DBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 93

EMDV

EMDV Risk / Return Rank: 22
EMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
EMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
EMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 20
EMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
EMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEM vs. EMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBEM	EMDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.58	0.71	+2.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.62	1.07	+3.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.13	+0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.13	1.09	+5.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.38	3.33	+21.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBEM vs. EMDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEM Sharpe Ratio is 3.58, which is higher than the EMDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEM and EMDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBEM	EMDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.58	0.71	+2.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	-0.21	+0.78
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.15	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.22	+0.12

Drawdowns

DBEM vs. EMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEM drawdown since its inception was -33.51%, smaller than the maximum EMDV drawdown of -39.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEM and EMDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBEM	EMDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.51%	-39.20%	+5.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.51%	-7.24%	-3.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.12%	-20.71%	+5.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.48%	-34.97%	+4.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.51%	-39.20%	+5.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.69%	-14.80%	+14.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.69%	-13.55%	+1.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.63%	2.37%	+0.26%

Volatility

DBEM vs. EMDV - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) has a higher volatility of 7.53% compared to ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) at 4.17%. This indicates that DBEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBEM	EMDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.53%	4.17%	+3.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.53%	9.21%	+6.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.96%	11.21%	+6.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.08%	15.42%	+1.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.14%	18.26%	-1.12%

DBEM vs. EMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEM has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than EMDV's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBEM vs. EMDV - Dividend Comparison

DBEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than EMDV's 2.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF	1.39%	1.84%	2.48%	2.55%	2.65%	1.77%	1.74%	2.59%	2.85%	1.51%	1.59%	3.49%
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	2.41%	2.46%	2.79%	1.88%	3.68%	2.12%	3.12%	2.38%	1.27%	2.09%	2.87%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBEM and EMDV in my portfolio?

DBEM and EMDV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBEM or EMDV?

DBEM has higher volatility (7.53%) compared to EMDV (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEM dropped -33.51% vs EMDV's -39.20%.

Which ETF is better, DBEM or EMDV?

On 10-year performance, DBEM leads with 10.73% vs 2.64% for EMDV. On fees, EMDV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, EMDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DBEM or EMDV?

Over the 10-year period, DBEM has performed better with a 10.73% return vs 2.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBEM or EMDV?

EMDV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DBEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DBEM or EMDV?

EMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 1.39% for DBEM.

What is the main difference between DBEM and EMDV?

DBEM tracks MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index, while EMDV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for DBEM and 0.60% for EMDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.58 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.