PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBEF vs. IPOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBEF vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 12.18% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 48.14% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEF has outperformed IPOS with an annualized return of 12.97%, while IPOS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.08% annualized return.


DBEF

1D
-1.75%
1M
2.24%
YTD
12.18%
6M
12.25%
1Y
28.10%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
13.34%
10Y*
12.97%

IPOS

1D
-4.56%
1M
15.69%
YTD
48.14%
6M
46.95%
1Y
76.08%
3Y*
20.01%
5Y*
-6.66%
10Y*
4.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEF vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
12.18%23.16%13.40%20.15%-5.13%19.60%2.03%24.94%-9.52%16.74%
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
48.14%39.93%-12.34%-16.49%-33.46%-30.62%50.71%30.93%-22.33%36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEF and IPOS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2014

0.46

The correlation between DBEF and IPOS shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DBEF vs. IPOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBEF
IPOS

Financial Services

24.3%
7.3%

Industrials

19.5%
13.4%

Technology

11.6%
50.2%

Healthcare

10.2%
14.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
4.2%

Basic Materials

6.3%
3.8%

Communication Services

4.8%
0.3%

Utilities

3.7%
3.1%

Energy

3.7%
4.9%

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Financial Services

DBEF
24.3%
IPOS
7.3%

Industrials

DBEF
19.5%
IPOS
13.4%

Technology

DBEF
11.6%
IPOS
50.2%

Healthcare

DBEF
10.2%
IPOS
14.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DBEF
7.6%
IPOS
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

DBEF
6.6%
IPOS
4.2%

Basic Materials

DBEF
6.3%
IPOS
3.8%

Communication Services

DBEF
4.8%
IPOS
0.3%

Utilities

DBEF
3.7%
IPOS
3.1%

Energy

DBEF
3.7%
IPOS
4.9%

Real Estate

DBEF
1.7%
IPOS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBEF vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEF
DBEF Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DBEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEF Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEF Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

IPOS
IPOS Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IPOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPOS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IPOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPOS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEF vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBEFIPOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

4.46

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.66

13.34

-0.67

DBEF vs. IPOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the IPOS Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEF and IPOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBEF vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and IPOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBEFIPOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.46%

-73.09%

+40.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-17.17%

+7.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.62%

-34.08%

+19.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.95%

-69.93%

+54.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.46%

-73.09%

+40.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-37.05%

+35.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-32.02%

+27.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

5.72%

-3.50%

Volatility

DBEF vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) is 4.61%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 15.81%. This indicates that DBEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBEFIPOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

15.81%

-11.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.93%

29.95%

-19.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.95%

32.50%

-19.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.85%

27.95%

-14.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.63%

24.41%

-8.78%

DBEF vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBEF vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison

DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than IPOS's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
2.32%5.55%1.29%4.46%15.85%2.28%2.41%3.03%3.22%2.98%2.55%3.70%
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
0.32%1.04%0.93%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.25%0.89%1.12%0.87%1.73%1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBEF and IPOS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPOS has higher volatility (15.81%) compared to DBEF (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs IPOS's -73.09%.

On 10-year performance, DBEF leads with 12.97% vs 4.08% for IPOS. On fees, DBEF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DBEF has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBEF has performed better with a 12.97% return vs 4.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBEF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.

DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 0.32% for IPOS.

DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for DBEF and 0.80% for IPOS.

IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBEF and IPOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer