DBEF vs. IPOS
DBEF (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF) and IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - DBEF tracks the MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index while IPOS tracks the Renaissance International IPO Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBEF returned 12.97%/yr vs 4.08%/yr for IPOS. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBEF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for IPOS.
Performance
DBEF vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 12.18% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 48.14% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEF has outperformed IPOS with an annualized return of 12.97%, while IPOS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.08% annualized return.
DBEF
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- 12.18%
- 6M
- 12.25%
- 1Y
- 28.10%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- 13.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.97%
IPOS
- 1D
- -4.56%
- 1M
- 15.69%
- YTD
- 48.14%
- 6M
- 46.95%
- 1Y
- 76.08%
- 3Y*
- 20.01%
- 5Y*
- -6.66%
- 10Y*
- 4.08%
DBEF vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 12.18% | 23.16% | 13.40% | 20.15% | -5.13% | 19.60% | 2.03% | 24.94% | -9.52% | 16.74% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 48.14% | 39.93% | -12.34% | -16.49% | -33.46% | -30.62% | 50.71% | 30.93% | -22.33% | 36.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBEF and IPOS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2014 | 0.46 |
The correlation between DBEF and IPOS shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DBEF vs. IPOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBEF
IPOS
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DBEF
IPOS
Industrials
DBEF
IPOS
Technology
DBEF
IPOS
Healthcare
DBEF
IPOS
Consumer Cyclical
DBEF
IPOS
Consumer Defensive
DBEF
IPOS
Basic Materials
DBEF
IPOS
Communication Services
DBEF
IPOS
Utilities
DBEF
IPOS
Energy
DBEF
IPOS
Real Estate
DBEF
IPOS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBEF vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank
DBEF
IPOS
DBEF vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBEF | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.42 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 4.46 | -1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.66 | 13.34 | -0.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBEF vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and IPOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBEF | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.46% | -73.09% | +40.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -17.17% | +7.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.62% | -34.08% | +19.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.95% | -69.93% | +54.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.46% | -73.09% | +40.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.75% | -37.05% | +35.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -32.02% | +27.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 5.72% | -3.50% |
Volatility
DBEF vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) is 4.61%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 15.81%. This indicates that DBEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBEF | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 15.81% | -11.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.93% | 29.95% | -19.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.95% | 32.50% | -19.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 27.95% | -14.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.63% | 24.41% | -8.78% |
DBEF vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBEF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBEF vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison
DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than IPOS's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 2.32% | 5.55% | 1.29% | 4.46% | 15.85% | 2.28% | 2.41% | 3.03% | 3.22% | 2.98% | 2.55% | 3.70% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 0.32% | 1.04% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.89% | 1.12% | 0.87% | 1.73% | 1.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBEF and IPOS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IPOS has higher volatility (15.81%) compared to DBEF (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs IPOS's -73.09%.
On 10-year performance, DBEF leads with 12.97% vs 4.08% for IPOS. On fees, DBEF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DBEF has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBEF has performed better with a 12.97% return vs 4.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBEF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.
DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 0.32% for IPOS.
DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for DBEF and 0.80% for IPOS.
IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBEF and IPOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer