DBEF vs. DBAW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DBEF (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF) and DBAW (Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - DBEF tracks the MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index while DBAW tracks the MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBEF returned 12.97%/yr vs 11.99%/yr for DBAW. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBEF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DBAW.

Performance

DBEF vs. DBAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 12.18% return, which is significantly lower than DBAW's 16.14% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEF has outperformed DBAW with an annualized return of 12.97%, while DBAW has yielded a comparatively lower 11.99% annualized return.

DBEF

• 1D: -1.75%
• 1M: 2.24%
• YTD: 12.18%
• 6M: 12.25%
• 1Y: 28.10%
• 3Y*: 18.83%
• 5Y*: 13.34%
• 10Y*: 12.97%

DBAW

• 1D: -2.70%
• 1M: 2.62%
• YTD: 16.14%
• 6M: 16.41%
• 1Y: 35.60%
• 3Y*: 21.48%
• 5Y*: 11.25%
• 10Y*: 11.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEF vs. DBAW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF	12.18%	23.16%	13.40%	20.15%	-5.13%	19.60%	2.03%	24.94%	-9.52%	16.74%
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF	16.14%	26.47%	14.35%	16.26%	-13.35%	13.08%	7.44%	22.96%	-10.38%	18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEF and DBAW is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2014	0.90

The correlation between DBEF and DBAW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBEF vs. DBAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DBEF	DBAW
Financial Services	24.3%	23.2%
Industrials	19.5%	14.3%
Technology	11.6%	22.4%
Healthcare	10.2%	6.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.6%	7.6%
Consumer Defensive	6.6%	5.0%
Basic Materials	6.3%	6.9%
Communication Services	4.8%	4.9%
Utilities	3.7%	2.9%
Energy	3.7%	4.8%
Real Estate	1.7%	1.4%

Return for Risk

DBEF vs. DBAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEF

DBEF Risk / Return Rank: 70
DBEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DBEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
DBEF Omega Ratio Rank: 72
DBEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
DBEF Martin Ratio Rank: 71

DBAW

DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 83
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 86
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEF vs. DBAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DBEF	DBAW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	2.55	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.03	3.41	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.49	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	3.98	-0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.66	16.14	-3.47

DBEF vs. DBAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the DBAW Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEF and DBAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DBEF vs. DBAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, roughly equal to the maximum DBAW drawdown of -31.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and DBAW.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBEF	DBAW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.46%	-31.44%	-1.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.41%	-9.00%	-0.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.62%	-14.11%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.95%	-17.87%	+2.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.46%	-31.44%	-1.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.75%	-2.70%	+0.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.72%	-4.98%	+0.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	2.21%	+0.01%

Volatility

DBEF vs. DBAW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) is 4.61%, while Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that DBEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBEF	DBAW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.61%	6.39%	-1.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.93%	12.35%	-1.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.95%	14.01%	-1.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.85%	13.97%	-0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.63%	15.21%	+0.42%

DBEF vs. DBAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DBAW's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBEF vs. DBAW - Dividend Comparison

DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than DBAW's 1.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF	1.69%	3.83%	1.70%	3.45%	8.81%	2.05%	2.08%	2.91%	2.93%	2.41%	1.99%	5.74%
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF	2.32%	5.55%	1.29%	4.46%	15.85%	2.28%	2.41%	3.03%	3.22%	2.98%	2.55%	3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBEF and DBAW in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, DBEF and DBAW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DBEF or DBAW?

DBAW has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to DBEF (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs DBAW's -31.44%.

Which ETF is better, DBEF or DBAW?

On 10-year performance, DBEF leads with 12.97% vs 11.99% for DBAW. On fees, DBEF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DBEF has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DBEF or DBAW?

Over the 10-year period, DBEF has performed better with a 12.97% return vs 11.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBEF or DBAW?

DBEF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DBAW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DBEF or DBAW?

DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 1.69% for DBAW.

What is the main difference between DBEF and DBAW?

DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for DBEF and 0.41% for DBAW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.