DBAW vs. EASG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DBAW (Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF) and EASG (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds from Deutsche Bank - DBAW tracks the MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index while EASG tracks the MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBAW returned 11.32%/yr vs 6.85%/yr for EASG. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBAW charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for EASG.

Performance

DBAW vs. EASG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBAW achieves a 16.12% return, which is significantly higher than EASG's 8.44% return.

DBAW

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 6.28%
• YTD: 16.12%
• 6M: 18.39%
• 1Y: 36.60%
• 3Y*: 21.15%
• 5Y*: 11.32%
• 10Y*: 11.44%

EASG

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 4.33%
• YTD: 8.44%
• 6M: 10.51%
• 1Y: 19.62%
• 3Y*: 13.77%
• 5Y*: 6.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBAW vs. EASG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF	16.12%	26.47%	14.35%	16.26%	-13.35%	13.08%	7.44%	22.96%	-6.11%
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF	8.44%	25.19%	2.26%	18.80%	-16.94%	11.36%	10.73%	23.66%	-5.41%

Correlation

The correlation between DBAW and EASG is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2018	0.86

The correlation between DBAW and EASG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBAW vs. EASG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DBAW	EASG
Financial Services	24.1%	23.5%
Technology	18.7%	12.8%
Industrials	15.0%	18.5%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	6.8%
Healthcare	7.2%	10.3%
Basic Materials	6.8%	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	6.6%
Energy	5.3%	3.4%
Communication Services	5.0%	5.6%
Utilities	3.2%	4.7%
Real Estate	1.5%	2.0%

Return for Risk

DBAW vs. EASG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBAW

DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 84
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 83

EASG

EASG Risk / Return Rank: 35
EASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
EASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
EASG Omega Ratio Rank: 34
EASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
EASG Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBAW vs. EASG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBAW	EASG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.86	1.27	+1.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.90	1.84	+2.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.23	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.09	1.68	+2.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.97	6.20	+10.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBAW vs. EASG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBAW Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the EASG Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBAW and EASG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBAW	EASG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.86	1.27	+1.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	0.41	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.51	+0.11

Drawdowns

DBAW vs. EASG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBAW drawdown since its inception was -31.44%, roughly equal to the maximum EASG drawdown of -32.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBAW and EASG.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBAW	EASG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.44%	-32.06%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.00%	-11.74%	+2.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.11%	-16.14%	+2.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.87%	-31.42%	+13.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-0.60%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.00%	-6.19%	+1.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	3.17%	-1.01%

Volatility

DBAW vs. EASG - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) have volatilities of 4.71% and 4.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBAW	EASG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.71%	4.83%	-0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.00%	12.54%	-1.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.88%	15.55%	-2.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.74%	16.64%	-2.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.28%	18.35%	-3.07%

DBAW vs. EASG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBAW has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than EASG's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBAW vs. EASG - Dividend Comparison

DBAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than EASG's 3.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF	3.29%	3.83%	1.70%	3.45%	8.81%	2.05%	2.08%	2.91%	2.93%	2.41%	1.99%	5.74%
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF	3.86%	4.18%	2.93%	2.51%	2.47%	2.69%	1.70%	2.94%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBAW and EASG in my portfolio?

DBAW and EASG have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBAW or EASG?

EASG has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to DBAW (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBAW dropped -31.44% vs EASG's -32.06%.

Which ETF is better, DBAW or EASG?

On 5-year performance, DBAW leads with 11.32% vs 6.85% for EASG. On fees, EASG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, DBAW has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DBAW or EASG?

Over the 5-year period, DBAW has performed better with a 11.32% return vs 6.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBAW or EASG?

EASG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DBAW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DBAW or EASG?

EASG has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 3.29% for DBAW.

What is the main difference between DBAW and EASG?

DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index, while EASG tracks MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DBAW and 0.14% for EASG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.