CXSE vs. MAGC
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC).
CXSE and MAGC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CXSE is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index. It was launched on Sep 19, 2012. MAGC is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Oct 3, 2024.
Performance
CXSE vs. MAGC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CXSE vs. MAGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | -5.37% | 37.00% | -17.14% |
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF | -13.26% | 16.35% | -14.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXSE achieves a -5.37% return, which is significantly higher than MAGC's -13.26% return.
CXSE
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -3.35%
- YTD
- -5.37%
- 6M
- -14.60%
- 1Y
- 13.26%
- 3Y*
- 4.84%
- 5Y*
- -9.25%
- 10Y*
- 6.57%
MAGC
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- -13.26%
- 6M
- -25.67%
- 1Y
- -19.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CXSE vs. MAGC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXSE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGC's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CXSE vs. MAGC — Risk / Return Rank
CXSE
MAGC
CXSE vs. MAGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CXSE | MAGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.53 | -0.63 | +1.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.86 | -0.75 | +1.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.91 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | -0.68 | +1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.80 | -1.48 | +3.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CXSE | MAGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | -0.63 | +1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | -0.27 | +0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between CXSE and MAGC is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CXSE vs. MAGC - Dividend Comparison
CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than MAGC's 4.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | 2.12% | 1.95% | 1.70% | 1.71% | 1.55% | 0.86% | 0.54% | 0.96% | 1.49% | 1.24% | 1.39% | 2.50% |
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF | 4.73% | 4.10% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CXSE vs. MAGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXSE drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, which is greater than MAGC's maximum drawdown of -28.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXSE and MAGC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXSE | MAGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.01% | -28.90% | -41.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | -28.90% | +11.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.38% | -27.11% | -22.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.59% | -13.71% | -13.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.64% | 13.32% | -5.68% |
Volatility
CXSE vs. MAGC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) is 6.47%, while Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that CXSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CXSE | MAGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.47% | 9.17% | -2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.27% | 18.40% | -3.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.92% | 30.91% | -5.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.28% | 34.70% | -2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.64% | 34.70% | -6.06% |