PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CX vs. INEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CX vs. INEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) and Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CX achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly higher than INEQ's 7.02% return.


CX

1D
-1.23%
1M
8.49%
YTD
12.51%
6M
19.05%
1Y
90.98%
3Y*
27.50%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
8.18%

INEQ

1D
-0.99%
1M
1.18%
YTD
7.02%
6M
10.22%
1Y
25.77%
3Y*
19.65%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CX vs. INEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CX
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.
12.51%105.97%-26.48%91.36%-40.27%31.14%36.77%-19.55%-35.73%-2.86%
INEQ
Columbia International Equity Income ETF
7.02%39.85%6.02%20.88%-5.95%10.18%-0.52%15.83%-18.30%24.88%

Correlation

The correlation between CX and INEQ is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2016

0.44

The correlation between CX and INEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CX vs. INEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CX
CX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

INEQ
INEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
INEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
INEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
INEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
INEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CX vs. INEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) and Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CXINEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.35

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

2.71

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.80

9.97

+3.83

CX vs. INEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the INEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CX and INEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CXINEQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

1.93

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.77

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.60

-0.46

Drawdowns

CX vs. INEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CX drawdown since its inception was -92.37%, which is greater than INEQ's maximum drawdown of -41.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CX and INEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CXINEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.37%

-41.71%

-50.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.99%

-9.56%

-14.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.38%

-14.38%

-30.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.05%

-24.51%

-38.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.17%

-3.77%

-34.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.18%

-7.06%

-44.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.62%

2.59%

+4.03%

Volatility

CX vs. INEQ - Volatility Comparison

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) has a higher volatility of 13.21% compared to Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) at 3.92%. This indicates that CX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CXINEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.21%

3.92%

+9.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.69%

10.62%

+18.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.12%

13.48%

+21.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.79%

15.30%

+24.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.53%

16.31%

+27.22%

Dividends

CX vs. INEQ - Dividend Comparison

CX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than INEQ's 9.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CX
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.
0.69%0.76%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INEQ
Columbia International Equity Income ETF
9.22%9.76%3.11%3.27%3.57%3.43%2.64%3.34%7.25%4.63%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


CX and INEQ have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CX has higher volatility (13.21%) compared to INEQ (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CX dropped -92.37% vs INEQ's -41.71%.

CX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CX and INEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer