CX vs. INEQ
CX (CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.) is a stock, while INEQ (Columbia International Equity Income ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Columbia Threadneedle. Over the past 5 years, CX returned 9.92%/yr vs 11.72%/yr for INEQ. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CX vs. INEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CX achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly higher than INEQ's 7.02% return.
CX
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 8.49%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 6M
- 19.05%
- 1Y
- 90.98%
- 3Y*
- 27.50%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.18%
INEQ
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 7.02%
- 6M
- 10.22%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- —
CX vs. INEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. | 12.51% | 105.97% | -26.48% | 91.36% | -40.27% | 31.14% | 36.77% | -19.55% | -35.73% | -2.86% |
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 7.02% | 39.85% | 6.02% | 20.88% | -5.95% | 10.18% | -0.52% | 15.83% | -18.30% | 24.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between CX and INEQ is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2016 | 0.44 |
The correlation between CX and INEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CX vs. INEQ — Risk / Return Rank
CX
INEQ
CX vs. INEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) and Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CX | INEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.35 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 2.71 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.80 | 9.97 | +3.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CX | INEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 1.93 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.77 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.60 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
CX vs. INEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CX drawdown since its inception was -92.37%, which is greater than INEQ's maximum drawdown of -41.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CX and INEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CX | INEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.37% | -41.71% | -50.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.99% | -9.56% | -14.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.38% | -14.38% | -30.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.05% | -24.51% | -38.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.17% | -3.77% | -34.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.18% | -7.06% | -44.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 2.59% | +4.03% |
Volatility
CX vs. INEQ - Volatility Comparison
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) has a higher volatility of 13.21% compared to Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) at 3.92%. This indicates that CX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CX | INEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.21% | 3.92% | +9.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.69% | 10.62% | +18.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.12% | 13.48% | +21.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.79% | 15.30% | +24.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.53% | 16.31% | +27.22% |
Dividends
CX vs. INEQ - Dividend Comparison
CX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than INEQ's 9.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. | 0.69% | 0.76% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 9.22% | 9.76% | 3.11% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 3.43% | 2.64% | 3.34% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CX and INEQ have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CX has higher volatility (13.21%) compared to INEQ (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CX dropped -92.37% vs INEQ's -41.71%.
CX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CX and INEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer