PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWS vs. DWUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CWS vs. DWUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CWS vs. DWUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CWS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF
-5.77%6.43%9.82%25.06%-10.42%22.20%17.12%0.10%
DWUS
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF
-6.08%12.75%20.26%20.62%-17.89%20.21%35.99%-0.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWS achieves a -5.77% return, which is significantly higher than DWUS's -6.08% return.


CWS

1D
2.17%
1M
-7.22%
YTD
-5.77%
6M
-5.35%
1Y
-0.78%
3Y*
8.80%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*

DWUS

1D
3.11%
1M
-6.05%
YTD
-6.08%
6M
-6.24%
1Y
9.52%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CWS vs. DWUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWS has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than DWUS's 1.17% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CWS vs. DWUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWS
CWS Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
CWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWS Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
CWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWS Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

DWUS
DWUS Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
DWUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWUS Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
DWUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWUS Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWS vs. DWUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CWSDWUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.05

0.47

-0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.05

0.79

-0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.11

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

0.83

-0.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.06

2.95

-3.01

CWS vs. DWUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWS Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the DWUS Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWS and DWUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWSDWUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

0.47

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.44

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.56

+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between CWS and DWUS is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CWS vs. DWUS - Dividend Comparison

CWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, more than DWUS's 0.03% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CWS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF
0.32%0.31%0.59%0.25%0.50%0.16%0.27%0.39%2.07%0.29%0.03%
DWUS
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF
0.03%0.03%0.18%0.29%0.89%0.35%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CWS vs. DWUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWS drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, which is greater than DWUS's maximum drawdown of -30.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWS and DWUS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CWSDWUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.82%

-30.47%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.92%

-11.98%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.87%

-26.45%

+1.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.01%

-9.24%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.51%

-7.00%

+2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

3.37%

+0.67%

Volatility

CWS vs. DWUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) is 4.78%, while AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that CWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DWUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CWSDWUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

6.03%

-1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.34%

12.72%

-2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.29%

20.29%

-4.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.64%

18.80%

-3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

22.02%

-5.06%