CWS vs. SPY
CWS (AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CWS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. CWS is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CWS returned 7.88%/yr vs 12.94%/yr for SPY. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CWS charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
CWS vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWS achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.45% return.
CWS
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- -0.84%
- 1Y
- -1.67%
- 3Y*
- 8.48%
- 5Y*
- 7.88%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 8.34%
- YTD
- 10.45%
- 1Y
- 21.46%
- 3Y*
- 20.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- 15.08%
CWS vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWS AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF | -0.84% | 6.43% | 9.82% | 25.06% | -10.42% | 22.20% | 17.12% | 30.97% | -6.46% | 20.92% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.45% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWS and SPY is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2016 | 0.74 |
The correlation between CWS and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CWS vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CWS
SPY
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
CWS
SPY
Industrials
CWS
SPY
Technology
CWS
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
CWS
SPY
Financial Services
CWS
SPY
Consumer Defensive
CWS
SPY
Utilities
CWS
SPY
Basic Materials
CWS
-
SPY
Communication Services
CWS
-
SPY
Energy
CWS
-
SPY
Real Estate
CWS
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWS vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
CWS
SPY
CWS vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWS | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.31 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 2.43 | -2.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.53 | 10.57 | -11.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWS vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWS drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWS and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWS | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.82% | -55.19% | +21.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | -8.88% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.56% | -18.76% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.87% | -24.50% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.30% | -1.12% | -4.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -9.02% | +4.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.80% | 2.03% | +2.77% |
Volatility
CWS vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) is 3.54%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that CWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWS | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 4.26% | -0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.39% | 10.01% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.47% | 12.60% | +0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 17.17% | -1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 17.93% | -1.06% |
CWS vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWS has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWS vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
CWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than SPY's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWS AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF | 0.31% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.16% | 0.27% | 0.39% | 2.07% | 0.29% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.00% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWS and SPY have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to CWS (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWS dropped -33.82% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 12.94% vs 7.88% for CWS. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, CWS has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 12.94% return vs 7.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for CWS.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.31% for CWS.
CWS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for CWS and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWS and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer