PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWUS vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWUS vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWUS achieves a 13.97% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.14% return.


DWUS

1D
-1.95%
1M
4.85%
YTD
13.97%
6M
14.75%
1Y
24.51%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
10.84%
10Y*

IBIT

1D
-1.51%
1M
-17.07%
YTD
-25.14%
6M
-25.23%
1Y
-39.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWUS vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DWUS
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF
13.97%12.75%20.21%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-25.14%-6.41%89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between DWUS and IBIT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWUS vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWUS
DWUS Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DWUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWUS Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DWUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWUS Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWUS vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWUSIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.86

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

-0.77

+2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.57

-1.33

+8.90

DWUS vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWUS and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWUS vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWUS drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWUS and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWUSIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.47%

-52.11%

+21.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.98%

-52.11%

+40.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-47.86%

+45.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-16.63%

+9.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

29.94%

-26.69%

Volatility

DWUS vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) is 8.98%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.78%. This indicates that DWUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWUSIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.98%

12.78%

-3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.68%

34.79%

-20.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.37%

44.33%

-26.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.15%

50.28%

-31.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

50.28%

-27.92%

DWUS vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWUS has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWUS vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

DWUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DWUS
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF
0.03%0.03%0.18%0.29%0.89%0.35%0.08%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWUS and IBIT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (12.78%) compared to DWUS (8.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWUS dropped -30.47% vs IBIT's -52.11%.

On 1-year performance, DWUS leads with 24.51% vs -39.85% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DWUS has been the lower-risk option at 8.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DWUS has performed better with a 24.51% return vs -39.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for DWUS.

DWUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

DWUS is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for DWUS and 0.25% for IBIT.

DWUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWUS and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer