DWUS vs. MSOS
DWUS (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF) and MSOS (AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DWUS is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while MSOS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DWUS returned 10.84%/yr vs -33.84%/yr for MSOS. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DWUS charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for MSOS.
Performance
DWUS vs. MSOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWUS achieves a 13.97% return, which is significantly higher than MSOS's 2.33% return.
DWUS
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- 13.97%
- 6M
- 14.75%
- 1Y
- 24.51%
- 3Y*
- 19.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.84%
- 10Y*
- —
MSOS
- 1D
- -2.23%
- 1M
- 9.52%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 6M
- -25.12%
- 1Y
- 118.55%
- 3Y*
- -4.12%
- 5Y*
- -33.84%
- 10Y*
- —
DWUS vs. MSOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF | 13.97% | 12.75% | 20.26% | 20.62% | -17.89% | 20.21% | 3.97% |
MSOS AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF | 2.33% | 23.88% | -45.65% | 0.29% | -72.68% | -29.69% | 44.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWUS and MSOS is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2020 | 0.24 |
DWUS vs. MSOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWUS
MSOS
Technology
-
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
DWUS
MSOS
-
Industrials
DWUS
MSOS
Financial Services
DWUS
MSOS
-
Communication Services
DWUS
MSOS
-
Healthcare
DWUS
MSOS
Consumer Cyclical
DWUS
MSOS
Consumer Defensive
DWUS
MSOS
-
Energy
DWUS
MSOS
-
Real Estate
DWUS
MSOS
Basic Materials
DWUS
MSOS
-
Utilities
DWUS
MSOS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWUS vs. MSOS — Risk / Return Rank
DWUS
MSOS
DWUS vs. MSOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DWUS | MSOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.26 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 2.25 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.57 | 4.25 | +3.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DWUS vs. MSOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWUS drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, smaller than the maximum MSOS drawdown of -96.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWUS and MSOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWUS | MSOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.47% | -96.25% | +65.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.98% | -52.91% | +40.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.63% | -81.71% | +62.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.45% | -94.95% | +68.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -91.20% | +89.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.84% | -71.81% | +64.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 28.03% | -24.78% |
Volatility
DWUS vs. MSOS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) is 8.98%, while AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) has a volatility of 21.27%. This indicates that DWUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWUS | MSOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.98% | 21.27% | -12.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.68% | 68.30% | -53.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.37% | 112.57% | -95.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.15% | 78.05% | -58.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 74.01% | -51.65% |
DWUS vs. MSOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWUS has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than MSOS's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWUS vs. MSOS - Dividend Comparison
DWUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while MSOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.18% | 0.29% | 0.89% | 0.35% | 0.08% |
MSOS AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.27% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWUS and MSOS have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSOS has higher volatility (21.27%) compared to DWUS (8.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWUS dropped -30.47% vs MSOS's -96.25%.
On 5-year performance, DWUS leads with 10.84% vs -33.84% for MSOS. On fees, MSOS is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, DWUS has been the lower-risk option at 8.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DWUS has performed better with a 10.84% return vs -33.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSOS is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for DWUS.
DWUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for MSOS.
DWUS is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while MSOS is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for DWUS and 0.74% for MSOS.
DWUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWUS and MSOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer