CWS vs. DGEIX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CWS (AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF) and DGEIX (DFA Global Equity Portfolio Institutional Class) are both funds - CWS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while DGEIX is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CWS returned 8.61%/yr vs 10.51%/yr for DGEIX. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CWS charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DGEIX.

Performance

CWS vs. DGEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) and DFA Global Equity Portfolio Institutional Class (DGEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWS achieves a 3.94% return, which is significantly lower than DGEIX's 12.26% return.

CWS

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: 3.96%
• 6M: 4.04%
• YTD: 3.94%
• 1Y: 5.20%
• 3Y*: 8.97%
• 5Y*: 8.61%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.72%

DGEIX

• 1D: 1.59%
• 1M: 0.16%
• 6M: 8.40%
• YTD: 12.26%
• 1Y: 24.21%
• 3Y*: 17.40%
• 5Y*: 10.51%
• 10Y*: 12.10%
• ALL TIME*: 9.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CWS AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF	$260.10K	$341.02K	$716.43K
DGEIX DFA Global Equity Portfolio Institutional Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

CWS vs. DGEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CWS AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF	3.94%	6.43%	9.82%	25.06%	-10.42%	22.20%	17.12%	30.97%	-6.46%	20.92%
DGEIX DFA Global Equity Portfolio Institutional Class	12.26%	19.86%	15.71%	20.35%	-14.72%	20.31%	13.51%	26.68%	-11.48%	21.36%

Correlation

The correlation between CWS and DGEIX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2016	0.75

The correlation between CWS and DGEIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CWS vs. DGEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CWS

CWS Risk / Return Rank: 18
CWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
CWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
CWS Omega Ratio Rank: 17
CWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
CWS Martin Ratio Rank: 18

DGEIX

DGEIX Risk / Return Rank: 78
DGEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
DGEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
DGEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
DGEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
DGEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CWS vs. DGEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) and DFA Global Equity Portfolio Institutional Class (DGEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CWS	DGEIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.34	1.78	-1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.58	2.50	-1.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.32	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.39	2.52	-2.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.98	10.76	-9.78

CWS vs. DGEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWS Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the DGEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWS and DGEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CWS vs. DGEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWS drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, smaller than the maximum DGEIX drawdown of -59.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWS and DGEIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CWS	DGEIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.82%	-59.77%	+25.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.92%	-8.85%	-3.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.56%	-16.97%	+0.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.87%	-25.20%	+0.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-0.84%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.54%	-7.95%	+3.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.69%	2.07%	+2.62%

Volatility

CWS vs. DGEIX - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to DFA Global Equity Portfolio Institutional Class (DGEIX) at 3.29%. This indicates that CWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CWS	DGEIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	3.29%	+0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.32%	10.09%	+0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.54%	12.54%	+1.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.69%	15.72%	-0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.84%	16.79%	+0.05%

CWS vs. DGEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWS has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than DGEIX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

CWS vs. DGEIX - Dividend Comparison

CWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than DGEIX's 2.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CWS AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF	0.29%	0.31%	0.59%	0.25%	0.50%	0.16%	0.27%	0.39%	2.07%	0.29%	0.03%	0.00%
DGEIX DFA Global Equity Portfolio Institutional Class	2.74%	2.79%	3.64%	3.82%	4.92%	1.94%	2.37%	2.22%	2.62%	1.50%	1.90%	1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CWS and DGEIX in my portfolio?

CWS and DGEIX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CWS or DGEIX?

CWS has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to DGEIX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWS dropped -33.82% vs DGEIX's -59.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.