CWS vs. BRK-B
CWS (AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, CWS returned 8.61%/yr vs 12.95%/yr for BRK-B. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
CWS vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWS achieves a 3.94% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's 1.77% return.
CWS
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- 3.96%
- 6M
- 4.04%
- YTD
- 3.94%
- 1Y
- 5.20%
- 3Y*
- 8.97%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.72%
BRK-B
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 6.45%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 8.18%
- 3Y*
- 13.24%
- 5Y*
- 12.95%
- 10Y*
- 13.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.04B | $2.04B | $2.42B | |
| $260.10K | $341.02K | $716.43K |
CWS vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWS AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF | 3.94% | 6.43% | 9.82% | 25.06% | -10.42% | 22.20% | 17.12% | 30.97% | -6.46% | 20.92% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 1.77% | 10.89% | 27.09% | 15.46% | 3.31% | 28.95% | 2.37% | 10.93% | 3.01% | 21.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWS and BRK-B is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2016 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CWS and BRK-B has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWS vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank
CWS
BRK-B
CWS vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWS | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.11 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 0.90 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.98 | 1.88 | -0.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWS vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWS drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWS and BRK-B.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWS | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.82% | -53.86% | +20.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | -9.42% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.56% | -14.95% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.87% | -26.58% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -5.24% | +4.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -11.06% | +6.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.69% | 4.49% | +0.20% |
Volatility
CWS vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) is 3.48%, while Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that CWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWS | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.48% | 4.59% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.32% | 11.13% | -0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 14.79% | -1.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 17.12% | -1.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 19.42% | -2.58% |
Dividends
CWS vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison
CWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CWS AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF | 0.29% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.16% | 0.27% | 0.39% | 2.07% | 0.29% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWS and BRK-B have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRK-B has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to CWS (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWS dropped -33.82% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.
BRK-B currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWS and BRK-B
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer