DWUS vs. GK
DWUS (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF) and GK (AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DWUS is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while GK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DWUS returned 9.13%/yr vs 2.46%/yr for GK. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DWUS charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GK.
Performance
DWUS vs. GK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWUS achieves a 6.13% return, which is significantly lower than GK's 10.37% return.
DWUS
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -4.34%
- 6M
- 4.31%
- YTD
- 6.13%
- 1Y
- 13.89%
- 3Y*
- 15.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.13%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.25%
GK
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -2.68%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- YTD
- 10.37%
- 1Y
- 15.62%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 2.46%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25.53K | $18.52K | $88.59K | |
| $30.57K | $31.19K | $45.15K |
DWUS vs. GK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF | 6.13% | 12.75% | 20.26% | 20.62% | -17.89% | 10.40% |
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF | 10.37% | 17.78% | 20.10% | 21.19% | -42.76% | 4.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWUS and GK is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021 | 0.84 |
The correlation between DWUS and GK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
DWUS vs. GK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWUS
GK
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
DWUS
GK
Industrials
DWUS
GK
Communication Services
DWUS
GK
Consumer Cyclical
DWUS
GK
Energy
DWUS
GK
-
Consumer Defensive
DWUS
GK
Healthcare
DWUS
GK
Financial Services
DWUS
GK
Basic Materials
DWUS
GK
-
Utilities
DWUS
GK
Real Estate
DWUS
GK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWUS vs. GK — Risk / Return Rank
DWUS
GK
DWUS vs. GK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DWUS | GK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.13 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 0.91 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.26 | 3.11 | +0.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DWUS vs. GK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWUS drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, smaller than the maximum GK drawdown of -47.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWUS and GK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWUS | GK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.47% | -47.72% | +17.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.35% | -15.13% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.63% | -23.62% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.45% | -47.72% | +21.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.02% | -6.29% | -3.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.82% | -23.37% | +16.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 4.44% | -0.38% |
Volatility
DWUS vs. GK - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) has a higher volatility of 8.91% compared to AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) at 7.00%. This indicates that DWUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWUS | GK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.91% | 7.00% | +1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.97% | 16.37% | +1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.62% | 19.76% | +0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 24.11% | -4.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.60% | 24.00% | -1.40% |
DWUS vs. GK - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWUS has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than GK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWUS vs. GK - Dividend Comparison
DWUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than GK's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.18% | 0.29% | 0.89% | 0.35% | 0.08% |
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 1.30% | 0.04% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, DWUS and GK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DWUS has higher volatility (8.91%) compared to GK (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWUS dropped -30.47% vs GK's -47.72%.
On 5-year performance, DWUS leads with 9.13% vs 2.46% for GK. On fees, GK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GK has been the lower-risk option at 7.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DWUS has performed better with a 9.13% return vs 2.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for DWUS.
GK has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.03% for DWUS.
DWUS is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while GK is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for DWUS and 0.75% for GK.
GK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWUS and GK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer