CW vs. KBA
CW (Curtiss-Wright Corporation) is a stock, while KBA (KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Index. Over the past 10 years, CW returned 24.17%/yr vs 9.46%/yr for KBA. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CW vs. KBA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CW achieves a 35.85% return, which is significantly higher than KBA's 8.41% return. Over the past 10 years, CW has outperformed KBA with an annualized return of 24.17%, while KBA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.46% annualized return.
CW
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -5.60%
- 6M
- 19.84%
- YTD
- 35.85%
- 1Y
- 46.51%
- 3Y*
- 55.03%
- 5Y*
- 44.56%
- 10Y*
- 24.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.36%
KBA
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 10.09%
- YTD
- 8.41%
- 1Y
- 33.21%
- 3Y*
- 12.81%
- 5Y*
- 7.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.62%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $157.50M | $156.08M | $204.24M | |
| $934.15K | $880.64K | $2.07M |
CW vs. KBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 35.85% | 55.66% | 59.73% | 33.98% | 21.03% | 19.86% | -16.83% | 38.70% | -15.79% | 24.56% |
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | 8.41% | 33.88% | 15.73% | -16.77% | -3.49% | 3.17% | 41.62% | 35.44% | -26.28% | 30.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between CW and KBA is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2014 | 0.22 |
The correlation between CW and KBA shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (5 years) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CW vs. KBA — Risk / Return Rank
CW
KBA
CW vs. KBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CW | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.28 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 4.00 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.44 | 9.39 | +0.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CW vs. KBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CW drawdown since its inception was -59.19%, which is greater than KBA's maximum drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CW and KBA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CW | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.19% | -53.24% | -5.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -8.33% | -5.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.21% | -31.23% | +4.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.21% | -39.76% | +12.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.73% | -45.32% | -3.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.60% | -5.37% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.86% | -25.51% | +11.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.98% | 3.55% | +1.43% |
Volatility
CW vs. KBA - Volatility Comparison
Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) has a higher volatility of 12.15% compared to KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) at 7.88%. This indicates that CW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CW | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.15% | 7.88% | +4.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.46% | 16.43% | +11.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.12% | 20.85% | +14.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.26% | 27.34% | +0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.51% | 25.50% | +5.01% |
Dividends
CW vs. KBA - Dividend Comparison
CW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than KBA's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% |
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | 1.44% | 1.56% | 2.18% | 2.34% | 49.05% | 9.07% | 0.65% | 1.53% | 3.77% | 1.46% | 6.62% | 29.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CW and KBA have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CW has higher volatility (12.15%) compared to KBA (7.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CW dropped -59.19% vs KBA's -53.24%.
KBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CW and KBA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer