PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CW vs. CARR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CW vs. CARR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and Carrier Global Corporation (CARR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CW achieves a 31.42% return, which is significantly higher than CARR's 18.32% return.


CW

1D
1.02%
1M
-4.77%
6M
10.33%
YTD
31.42%
1Y
46.91%
3Y*
56.37%
5Y*
44.17%
10Y*
24.02%
ALL TIME*
16.26%

CARR

1D
0.68%
1M
-11.47%
6M
4.49%
YTD
18.32%
1Y
-6.22%
3Y*
2.60%
5Y*
3.79%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
28.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$590.03M$475.98M$441.62M
$151.67M$160.90M$206.01M

CW vs. CARR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
31.42%55.66%59.73%33.98%21.03%19.86%35.15%
CARR
Carrier Global Corporation
18.32%-21.57%20.26%41.47%-22.68%45.31%176.86%

Correlation

The correlation between CW and CARR is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2020

0.43

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CW:

$26.75B

CARR:

$50.95B

EPS

CW:

$13.69

CARR:

$1.44

PE Ratio

CW:

52.89

CARR:

42.91

PEG Ratio

CW:

2.89

CARR:

0.63

PS Ratio

CW:

7.50

CARR:

2.37

PB Ratio

CW:

10.19

CARR:

3.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

CW:

$3.61B

CARR:

$22.11B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CW:

$1.34B

CARR:

$5.38B

EBITDA (TTM)

CW:

$745.31M

CARR:

$2.75B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CW vs. CARR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CW
CW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CW Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
CW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CW Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

CARR
CARR Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
CARR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARR Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CARR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARR Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CW vs. CARR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and Carrier Global Corporation (CARR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CWCARRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.99

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

-0.34

+3.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.71

-0.68

+10.39

CW vs. CARR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CW Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the CARR Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CW and CARR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CW vs. CARR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CW drawdown since its inception was -59.19%, which is greater than CARR's maximum drawdown of -40.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CW and CARR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWCARRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.19%

-40.82%

-18.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.30%

-25.38%

+11.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.21%

-37.91%

+10.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.21%

-40.82%

+13.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.67%

-22.92%

+14.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.86%

-14.20%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

13.38%

-8.43%

Volatility

CW vs. CARR - Volatility Comparison

Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) have volatilities of 12.78% and 12.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWCARRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.78%

12.94%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.31%

30.28%

-2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.97%

35.83%

-0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.23%

32.34%

-4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.49%

34.98%

-4.49%

Dividends

CW vs. CARR - Dividend Comparison

CW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than CARR's 1.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CARR
Carrier Global Corporation
1.53%1.70%1.16%1.30%1.54%0.94%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
0.14%0.17%0.23%0.35%0.45%0.51%0.58%0.47%0.59%0.46%0.53%0.76%

Financials

CW vs. CARR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Carrier Global Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

CW vs. CARR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Carrier Global Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

CW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 331.48M and revenue of 913.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.

CARR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carrier Global Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.73B and revenue of 6.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.

CW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 160.42M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

CARR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carrier Global Corporation reported an operating income of 770.00M and revenue of 6.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.

CW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 128.19M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.

CARR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carrier Global Corporation reported a net income of 501.00M and revenue of 6.35B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CW and CARR have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CARR has higher volatility (12.94%) compared to CW (12.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CW dropped -59.19% vs CARR's -40.82%.

CW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CW and CARR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer