PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CW vs. CARR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CW vs. CARR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and Carrier Global Corporation (CARR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CW achieves a 42.28% return, which is significantly higher than CARR's 37.05% return.


CW

1D
1.54%
1M
7.23%
YTD
42.28%
6M
38.08%
1Y
68.16%
3Y*
65.88%
5Y*
45.89%
10Y*
26.16%

CARR

1D
0.06%
1M
13.79%
YTD
37.05%
6M
36.12%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
15.90%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CW vs. CARR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
42.28%55.66%59.73%33.98%21.03%19.86%35.15%
CARR
Carrier Global Corporation
37.05%-21.57%20.26%41.47%-22.68%45.31%176.86%

Correlation

The correlation between CW and CARR is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2020

0.43

The correlation between CW and CARR shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CW:

$29.05B

CARR:

$60.56B

EPS

CW:

$13.64

CARR:

$1.55

PE Ratio

CW:

57.47

CARR:

46.50

PEG Ratio

CW:

3.14

CARR:

0.68

PS Ratio

CW:

8.14

CARR:

2.80

PB Ratio

CW:

11.04

CARR:

4.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

CW:

$3.61B

CARR:

$21.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CW:

$1.34B

CARR:

$5.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

CW:

$745.31M

CARR:

$3.15B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CW vs. CARR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CW
CW Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CW Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CW Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

CARR
CARR Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CARR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARR Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
CARR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARR Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CW vs. CARR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and Carrier Global Corporation (CARR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CWCARRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.05

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.28

0.10

+5.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.35

0.16

+15.19

CW vs. CARR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CW Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the CARR Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CW and CARR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CW vs. CARR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CW drawdown since its inception was -59.19%, which is greater than CARR's maximum drawdown of -40.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CW and CARR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWCARRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.19%

-40.82%

-18.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.97%

-37.38%

+24.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.21%

-37.91%

+10.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.21%

-40.82%

+13.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.72%

+10.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.88%

-14.20%

+0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.45%

24.14%

-19.69%

Volatility

CW vs. CARR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is 8.53%, while Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) has a volatility of 10.54%. This indicates that CW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWCARRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.53%

10.54%

-2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.47%

27.73%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.01%

35.54%

-2.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.84%

31.92%

-4.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.32%

34.81%

-4.49%

Dividends

CW vs. CARR - Dividend Comparison

CW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than CARR's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CARR
Carrier Global Corporation
1.61%1.70%1.16%1.30%1.54%0.94%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
0.13%0.17%0.23%0.35%0.45%0.51%0.58%0.47%0.59%0.46%0.53%0.76%

Financials

CW vs. CARR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Carrier Global Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
913.69M
5.34B
(CW) Total Revenue
(CARR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CW vs. CARR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Carrier Global Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
36.3%
23.3%
Portfolio components
CW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 331.48M and revenue of 913.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.

CARR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carrier Global Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.24B and revenue of 5.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.3%.

CW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 160.42M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

CARR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carrier Global Corporation reported an operating income of 259.00M and revenue of 5.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

CW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 128.19M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.

CARR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carrier Global Corporation reported a net income of 238.00M and revenue of 5.34B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CW and CARR have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CARR has higher volatility (10.54%) compared to CW (8.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CW dropped -59.19% vs CARR's -40.82%.

CW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CW and CARR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer