CW vs. GGG
CW (Curtiss-Wright Corporation) and GGG (Graco Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Specialty Industrial Machinery industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, CW returned 24.02%/yr vs 13.99%/yr for GGG. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CW vs. GGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CW achieves a 31.42% return, which is significantly higher than GGG's -2.12% return. Over the past 10 years, CW has outperformed GGG with an annualized return of 24.02%, while GGG has yielded a comparatively lower 13.99% annualized return.
CW
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- YTD
- 31.42%
- 1Y
- 46.91%
- 3Y*
- 56.37%
- 5Y*
- 44.17%
- 10Y*
- 24.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.26%
GGG
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 5.92%
- 6M
- -8.43%
- YTD
- -2.12%
- 1Y
- -2.51%
- 3Y*
- 1.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.62%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $151.67M | $160.90M | $206.01M | |
GGG Graco Inc. | $139.07M | $112.59M | $111.19M |
CW vs. GGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 31.42% | 55.66% | 59.73% | 33.98% | 21.03% | 19.86% | -16.83% | 38.70% | -15.79% | 24.56% |
GGG Graco Inc. | -2.12% | -1.46% | -1.68% | 30.62% | -15.48% | 12.56% | 40.97% | 25.94% | -6.34% | 65.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CW and GGG is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.38 |
The correlation between CW and GGG shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.49 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CW:
$26.75B
GGG:
$12.86B
CW:
$13.69
GGG:
$4.23
CW:
52.89
GGG:
18.78
CW:
2.89
GGG:
3.69
CW:
7.50
GGG:
4.42
CW:
$3.61B
GGG:
$2.27B
CW:
$1.34B
GGG:
$1.19B
CW:
$745.31M
GGG:
$733.25M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CW vs. GGG — Risk / Return Rank
CW
GGG
CW vs. GGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and Graco Inc. (GGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CW | GGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.98 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | -0.18 | +3.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.71 | -0.37 | +10.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CW vs. GGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CW drawdown since its inception was -59.19%, smaller than the maximum GGG drawdown of -68.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CW and GGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CW | GGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.19% | -68.77% | +9.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -22.55% | +8.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.21% | -22.55% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.21% | -28.98% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.73% | -30.60% | -18.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.67% | -15.67% | +7.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.86% | -12.13% | -1.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.95% | 11.13% | -6.18% |
Volatility
CW vs. GGG - Volatility Comparison
Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) has a higher volatility of 12.78% compared to Graco Inc. (GGG) at 8.51%. This indicates that CW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CW | GGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.78% | 8.51% | +4.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.31% | 15.66% | +11.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.97% | 20.53% | +14.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.23% | 22.86% | +5.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.49% | 24.63% | +5.86% |
Dividends
CW vs. GGG - Dividend Comparison
CW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than GGG's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% |
GGG Graco Inc. | 1.46% | 1.34% | 1.21% | 1.08% | 1.25% | 0.93% | 0.97% | 1.23% | 1.27% | 1.06% | 1.59% | 1.67% |
Financials
CW vs. GGG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Graco Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CW vs. GGG - Profitability Comparison
CW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 331.48M and revenue of 913.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.
GGG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Graco Inc. reported a gross profit of 316.94M and revenue of 590.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.7%.
CW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 160.42M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
GGG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Graco Inc. reported an operating income of 175.09M and revenue of 590.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.7%.
CW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 128.19M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
GGG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Graco Inc. reported a net income of 144.93M and revenue of 590.55M, resulting in a net margin of 24.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CW and GGG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CW has higher volatility (12.78%) compared to GGG (8.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CW dropped -59.19% vs GGG's -68.77%.
CW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CW and GGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer