CW vs. GGG
Compare and contrast key facts about Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and Graco Inc. (GGG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CW or GGG.
Correlation
The correlation between CW and GGG is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CW vs. GGG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CW:
0.33
GGG:
-0.78
CW:
0.62
GGG:
-0.96
CW:
1.09
GGG:
0.88
CW:
0.38
GGG:
-0.88
CW:
1.27
GGG:
-1.73
CW:
8.16%
GGG:
9.66%
CW:
31.05%
GGG:
21.34%
CW:
-59.19%
GGG:
-68.77%
CW:
-27.21%
GGG:
-18.96%
Fundamentals
CW:
$10.67B
GGG:
$12.74B
CW:
$10.56
GGG:
$2.82
CW:
26.82
GGG:
26.87
CW:
2.71
GGG:
2.41
CW:
$2.41B
GGG:
$1.62B
CW:
$899.79M
GGG:
$856.26M
CW:
$538.04M
GGG:
$485.35M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CW achieves a -20.15% return, which is significantly lower than GGG's -9.82% return. Over the past 10 years, CW has outperformed GGG with an annualized return of 14.79%, while GGG has yielded a comparatively lower 14.05% annualized return.
CW
-20.15%
-12.51%
-15.99%
11.10%
28.29%
14.79%
GGG
-9.82%
-11.47%
-11.13%
-15.90%
12.10%
14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CW vs. GGG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CW
GGG
CW vs. GGG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and Graco Inc. (GGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CW vs. GGG - Dividend Comparison
CW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than GGG's 1.37% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.30% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% | 0.74% |
GGG Graco Inc. | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.08% | 1.25% | 0.93% | 0.97% | 1.23% | 1.27% | 2.65% | 1.59% | 1.67% | 2.40% |
Drawdowns
CW vs. GGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CW drawdown since its inception was -59.19%, smaller than the maximum GGG drawdown of -68.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CW and GGG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CW vs. GGG - Volatility Comparison
Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) has a higher volatility of 12.97% compared to Graco Inc. (GGG) at 8.95%. This indicates that CW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CW vs. GGG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Graco Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities