CW vs. EMR
Compare and contrast key facts about Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and Emerson Electric Co. (EMR).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CW or EMR.
Key characteristics
| CW | EMR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 69.72% | 32.60% |
| 1Y Return | 84.87% | 53.19% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 41.71% | 11.66% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 22.70% | 14.21% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 18.95% | 10.01% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.83 | 2.03 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.87 | 3.03 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.66 | 1.42 |
| Calmar Ratio | 8.15 | 3.11 |
| Martin Ratio | 32.98 | 8.61 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.47% | 6.14% |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.33% | 26.04% |
| Max Drawdown | -59.19% | -56.14% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.05% | 0.00% |
Fundamentals
| CW | EMR | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $14.32B | $67.31B |
| EPS | $10.57 | $3.18 |
| PE Ratio | 35.71 | 37.00 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.71 | 2.30 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $3.08B | $17.49B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.14B | $5.35B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $627.98M | $888.00M |
Correlation
The correlation between CW and EMR is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CW vs. EMR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CW achieves a 69.72% return, which is significantly higher than EMR's 32.60% return. Over the past 10 years, CW has outperformed EMR with an annualized return of 18.95%, while EMR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.01% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CW vs. EMR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and Emerson Electric Co. (EMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CW vs. EMR - Dividend Comparison
CW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than EMR's 1.65% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.22% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% | 0.74% | 0.63% |
EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 1.65% | 2.14% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.49% | 2.58% | 3.26% | 2.76% | 3.42% | 3.94% | 2.85% | 2.37% |
Drawdowns
CW vs. EMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CW drawdown since its inception was -59.19%, which is greater than EMR's maximum drawdown of -56.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CW and EMR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CW vs. EMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is 8.64%, while Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) has a volatility of 10.82%. This indicates that CW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CW vs. EMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Emerson Electric Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities