CW vs. ANF
CW (Curtiss-Wright Corporation) and ANF (Abercrombie & Fitch Co.) are both stocks. CW operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while ANF operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, CW returned 25.12%/yr vs 19.26%/yr for ANF. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CW vs. ANF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CW achieves a 37.55% return, which is significantly higher than ANF's -28.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CW has outperformed ANF with an annualized return of 25.12%, while ANF has yielded a comparatively lower 19.26% annualized return.
CW
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 37.55%
- 6M
- 38.99%
- 1Y
- 60.13%
- 3Y*
- 63.08%
- 5Y*
- 43.15%
- 10Y*
- 25.12%
ANF
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 25.97%
- YTD
- -28.04%
- 6M
- -19.20%
- 1Y
- 15.01%
- 3Y*
- 37.30%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 19.26%
CW vs. ANF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 37.55% | 55.66% | 59.73% | 33.98% | 21.03% | 19.86% | -16.83% | 38.70% | -15.79% | 24.56% |
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | -28.04% | -15.79% | 69.43% | 285.07% | -34.22% | 71.07% | 19.48% | -9.74% | 19.24% | 54.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between CW and ANF is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 1996 | 0.31 |
The correlation between CW and ANF shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.32 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CW:
$28.09B
ANF:
$4.14B
CW:
$13.64
ANF:
$10.45
CW:
55.58
ANF:
8.67
CW:
3.03
ANF:
0.00
CW:
7.88
ANF:
0.81
CW:
10.67
ANF:
3.09
CW:
$3.61B
ANF:
$5.28B
CW:
$1.34B
ANF:
$2.56B
CW:
$745.31M
ANF:
$727.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CW vs. ANF — Risk / Return Rank
CW
ANF
CW vs. ANF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CW | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.11 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.66 | 0.33 | +4.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.53 | 0.62 | +12.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CW vs. ANF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CW drawdown since its inception was -59.19%, smaller than the maximum ANF drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CW and ANF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CW | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.19% | -86.59% | +27.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.97% | -45.65% | +32.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.21% | -65.89% | +38.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.21% | -69.93% | +42.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.73% | -72.45% | +23.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -52.91% | +52.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.89% | -42.90% | +29.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 24.42% | -19.96% |
Volatility
CW vs. ANF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is 10.40%, while Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) has a volatility of 15.82%. This indicates that CW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CW | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.40% | 15.82% | -5.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.00% | 38.52% | -12.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.95% | 61.90% | -28.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.89% | 61.04% | -33.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.31% | 61.00% | -30.69% |
Dividends
CW vs. ANF - Dividend Comparison
CW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while ANF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 4.63% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 6.67% | 2.96% |
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% |
Financials
CW vs. ANF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Abercrombie & Fitch Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CW vs. ANF - Profitability Comparison
CW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 331.48M and revenue of 913.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.
ANF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 160.42M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
ANF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported an operating income of -2.76M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
CW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 128.19M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
ANF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a net income of 67.13M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CW and ANF have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANF has higher volatility (15.82%) compared to CW (10.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CW dropped -59.19% vs ANF's -86.59%.
CW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CW and ANF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer