ANF vs. BOOT

In the year-to-date period, ANF achieves a -51.17% return, which is significantly lower than BOOT's -39.70% return. Over the past 10 years, ANF has outperformed BOOT with an annualized return of 15.16%, while BOOT has yielded a comparatively lower 14.15% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) and Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ANF Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the BOOT Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANF and BOOT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither ANF nor BOOT has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum ANF drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, roughly equal to the maximum BOOT drawdown of -83.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANF and BOOT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) has a higher volatility of 27.64% compared to Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) at 26.05%. This indicates that ANF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.