PortfoliosLab logo
ANF vs. BOOT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ANF and BOOT is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ANF vs. BOOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) and Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
177.33%
581.03%
ANF
BOOT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ANF:

-0.68

BOOT:

0.28

Sortino Ratio

ANF:

-0.80

BOOT:

0.69

Omega Ratio

ANF:

0.90

BOOT:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

ANF:

-0.67

BOOT:

0.27

Martin Ratio

ANF:

-1.25

BOOT:

0.66

Ulcer Index

ANF:

34.63%

BOOT:

20.38%

Daily Std Dev

ANF:

63.63%

BOOT:

53.62%

Max Drawdown

ANF:

-86.59%

BOOT:

-83.73%

Current Drawdown

ANF:

-61.90%

BOOT:

-31.90%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ANF:

$3.37B

BOOT:

$3.44B

EPS

ANF:

$10.69

BOOT:

$5.60

PE Ratio

ANF:

6.62

BOOT:

20.06

PEG Ratio

ANF:

-24.52

BOOT:

1.72

PS Ratio

ANF:

0.68

BOOT:

1.86

PB Ratio

ANF:

2.52

BOOT:

3.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

ANF:

$3.93B

BOOT:

$1.46B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ANF:

$2.50B

BOOT:

$548.46M

EBITDA (TTM)

ANF:

$756.19M

BOOT:

$237.14M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANF achieves a -50.97% return, which is significantly lower than BOOT's -21.72% return. Over the past 10 years, ANF has underperformed BOOT with an annualized return of 15.34%, while BOOT has yielded a comparatively higher 17.36% annualized return.


ANF

YTD

-50.97%

1M

9.49%

6M

-48.23%

1Y

-43.01%

5Y*

47.42%

10Y*

15.34%

BOOT

YTD

-21.72%

1M

29.29%

6M

-11.62%

1Y

14.71%

5Y*

43.37%

10Y*

17.36%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ANF vs. BOOT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ANF is 1616
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ANF is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ANF is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ANF is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ANF is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ANF is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

BOOT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BOOT is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BOOT is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BOOT is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BOOT is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BOOT is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BOOT is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ANF vs. BOOT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) and Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ANF Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the BOOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANF and BOOT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.68
0.28
ANF
BOOT

Dividends

ANF vs. BOOT - Dividend Comparison

Neither ANF nor BOOT has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.98%4.63%3.99%4.59%6.67%2.96%2.79%
BOOT
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ANF vs. BOOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANF drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, roughly equal to the maximum BOOT drawdown of -83.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANF and BOOT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-61.90%
-31.90%
ANF
BOOT

Volatility

ANF vs. BOOT - Volatility Comparison

Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) and Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) have volatilities of 18.62% and 18.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
18.62%
18.65%
ANF
BOOT

Financials

ANF vs. BOOT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50BJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
1.58B
608.17M
(ANF) Total Revenue
(BOOT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ANF vs. BOOT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
61.5%
39.3%
(ANF) Gross Margin
(BOOT) Gross Margin
ANF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a gross profit of 974.01M and revenue of 1.58B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.5%.

BOOT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 238.87M and revenue of 608.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.3%.

ANF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported an operating income of 256.06M and revenue of 1.58B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.

BOOT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 99.46M and revenue of 608.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.

ANF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a net income of 187.23M and revenue of 1.58B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.

BOOT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 75.07M and revenue of 608.17M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.