ANF vs. AMR
ANF (Abercrombie & Fitch Co.) and AMR (Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.) are both stocks. ANF operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while AMR operates in Coking Coal (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, ANF returned 21.36%/yr vs 38.98%/yr for AMR. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ANF vs. AMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANF achieves a -20.92% return, which is significantly higher than AMR's -31.38% return.
ANF
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 7.70%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- -20.92%
- 1Y
- 9.31%
- 3Y*
- 36.08%
- 5Y*
- 21.36%
- 10Y*
- 19.65%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.14%
AMR
- 1D
- -4.62%
- 1M
- -14.27%
- 6M
- -34.62%
- YTD
- -31.38%
- 1Y
- 19.19%
- 3Y*
- -7.50%
- 5Y*
- 38.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $43.20M | $39.04M | $46.12M | |
| $85.39M | $92.43M | $110.00M |
ANF vs. AMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | -20.92% | -15.79% | 69.43% | 285.07% | -34.22% | 71.07% | 19.48% | -9.74% | 19.24% | 61.67% |
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. | -31.38% | -0.12% | -40.95% | 133.87% | 150.06% | 436.94% | 25.64% | -86.23% | 10.71% | -4.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANF and AMR is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2017 | 0.20 |
The correlation between ANF and AMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ANF:
$4.42B
AMR:
$1.74B
ANF:
$10.45
AMR:
-$3.01
ANF:
0.89
AMR:
0.83
ANF:
3.39
AMR:
1.16
ANF:
$5.28B
AMR:
$2.12B
ANF:
$2.56B
AMR:
$31.72M
ANF:
$727.85M
AMR:
$128.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANF vs. AMR — Risk / Return Rank
ANF
AMR
ANF vs. AMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) and Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ANF | AMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.09 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 0.36 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.14 | 0.78 | -0.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ANF vs. AMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANF drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, smaller than the maximum AMR drawdown of -97.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANF and AMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANF | AMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.59% | -97.35% | +10.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.65% | -45.06% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.89% | -77.51% | +11.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.93% | -77.51% | +7.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.25% | -68.98% | +20.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.94% | -40.70% | -2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.57% | 20.65% | +5.92% |
Volatility
ANF vs. AMR - Volatility Comparison
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) has a higher volatility of 13.97% compared to Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) at 11.36%. This indicates that ANF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANF | AMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.97% | 11.36% | +2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.42% | 38.89% | -4.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.38% | 57.06% | +5.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.21% | 58.89% | +2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.07% | 73.36% | -12.29% |
Dividends
ANF vs. AMR - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANF nor AMR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.57% | 4.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 4.63% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 6.67% | 2.96% |
Financials
ANF vs. AMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ANF vs. AMR - Profitability Comparison
ANF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
AMR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 524.99M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ANF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported an operating income of -2.76M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
AMR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.59M and revenue of 524.99M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
ANF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a net income of 67.13M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
AMR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -11.03M and revenue of 524.99M, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANF and AMR have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANF has higher volatility (13.97%) compared to AMR (11.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANF dropped -86.59% vs AMR's -97.35%.
AMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ANF and AMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer