ANF vs. LLY
Compare and contrast key facts about Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ANF or LLY.
Correlation
The correlation between ANF and LLY is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ANF vs. LLY - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ANF:
1.12
LLY:
1.34
ANF:
1.74
LLY:
1.97
ANF:
1.22
LLY:
1.26
ANF:
1.98
LLY:
1.67
ANF:
3.65
LLY:
4.79
ANF:
17.59%
LLY:
8.43%
ANF:
57.45%
LLY:
30.25%
ANF:
-86.59%
LLY:
-68.27%
ANF:
-20.94%
LLY:
-16.98%
Fundamentals
ANF:
$7.69B
LLY:
$700.23B
ANF:
$10.10
LLY:
$9.27
ANF:
15.12
LLY:
83.99
ANF:
-24.52
LLY:
0.74
ANF:
$4.82B
LLY:
$40.86B
ANF:
$3.11B
LLY:
$33.33B
ANF:
$648.85M
LLY:
$12.51B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANF achieves a 72.38% return, which is significantly higher than LLY's 37.39% return. Over the past 10 years, ANF has underperformed LLY with an annualized return of 21.17%, while LLY has yielded a comparatively higher 29.96% annualized return.
ANF
72.38%
0.05%
-12.22%
64.26%
54.89%
21.17%
LLY
37.39%
6.37%
-11.77%
40.41%
45.41%
29.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ANF vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ANF vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison
ANF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 4.63% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 6.67% | 2.96% | 2.79% | 2.43% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 0.65% | 0.78% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.75% | 1.96% | 1.95% | 2.46% | 2.77% | 2.37% | 2.84% | 3.84% |
Drawdowns
ANF vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANF drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, which is greater than LLY's maximum drawdown of -68.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANF and LLY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ANF vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) has a higher volatility of 17.56% compared to Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) at 7.95%. This indicates that ANF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ANF vs. LLY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities