ANF vs. POWL
ANF (Abercrombie & Fitch Co.) and POWL (Powell Industries, Inc.) are both stocks. ANF operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while POWL operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, ANF returned 19.21%/yr vs 41.54%/yr for POWL. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ANF vs. POWL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANF achieves a -31.62% return, which is significantly lower than POWL's 189.91% return. Over the past 10 years, ANF has underperformed POWL with an annualized return of 19.21%, while POWL has yielded a comparatively higher 41.54% annualized return.
ANF
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 11.40%
- YTD
- -31.62%
- 6M
- -30.99%
- 1Y
- 10.32%
- 3Y*
- 32.58%
- 5Y*
- 14.54%
- 10Y*
- 19.21%
POWL
- 1D
- 3.57%
- 1M
- 10.24%
- YTD
- 189.91%
- 6M
- 174.62%
- 1Y
- 427.82%
- 3Y*
- 151.29%
- 5Y*
- 99.89%
- 10Y*
- 41.54%
ANF vs. POWL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | -31.62% | -15.79% | 69.43% | 285.07% | -34.22% | 71.07% | 19.48% | -9.74% | 19.24% | 54.15% |
POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 189.91% | 44.49% | 152.21% | 155.62% | 24.34% | 3.60% | -37.60% | 101.58% | -9.92% | -24.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANF and POWL is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 1996 | 0.24 |
The correlation between ANF and POWL shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.31 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ANF:
$3.93B
POWL:
$11.25B
ANF:
$10.45
POWL:
$5.12
ANF:
8.24
POWL:
60.14
ANF:
0.00
POWL:
0.09
ANF:
0.77
POWL:
9.93
ANF:
2.93
POWL:
15.86
ANF:
$5.28B
POWL:
$1.13B
ANF:
$2.56B
POWL:
$340.78M
ANF:
$727.85M
POWL:
$236.11M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANF vs. POWL — Risk / Return Rank
ANF
POWL
ANF vs. POWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) and Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ANF | POWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.67 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | 13.97 | -13.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.42 | 44.14 | -43.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ANF vs. POWL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANF drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, which is greater than POWL's maximum drawdown of -73.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANF and POWL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANF | POWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.59% | -73.10% | -13.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.65% | -30.88% | -14.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.89% | -55.76% | -10.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.93% | -55.76% | -14.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.45% | -68.85% | -3.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.25% | -4.39% | -50.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.91% | -36.08% | -6.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.84% | 9.75% | +15.09% |
Volatility
ANF vs. POWL - Volatility Comparison
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) and Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) have volatilities of 16.92% and 17.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANF | POWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.92% | 17.67% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.35% | 43.95% | -5.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.05% | 59.48% | +2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.09% | 64.40% | -3.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.05% | 54.90% | +6.15% |
Dividends
ANF vs. POWL - Dividend Comparison
ANF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 4.63% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 6.67% | 2.96% |
POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 0.12% | 0.34% | 0.48% | 1.19% | 2.96% | 3.53% | 3.53% | 2.12% | 4.16% | 3.63% | 2.67% | 4.00% |
Financials
ANF vs. POWL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Powell Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ANF vs. POWL - Profitability Comparison
ANF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
POWL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 87.94M and revenue of 296.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.
ANF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported an operating income of -2.76M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
POWL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.58M and revenue of 296.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.
ANF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a net income of 67.13M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
POWL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 45.89M and revenue of 296.62M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANF and POWL have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POWL has higher volatility (17.67%) compared to ANF (16.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANF dropped -86.59% vs POWL's -73.10%.
POWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.27 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ANF and POWL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer