CVNY vs. XOMO
CVNY (YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF) and XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CVNY returned -0.68% vs 31.19% for XOMO. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. CVNY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for XOMO.
Performance
CVNY vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVNY achieves a -17.77% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 16.03% return.
CVNY
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -12.46%
- YTD
- -17.77%
- 6M
- -13.65%
- 1Y
- -0.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XOMO
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 16.03%
- 6M
- 18.72%
- 1Y
- 31.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVNY vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CVNY YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF | -17.77% | 54.11% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 16.03% | 5.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVNY and XOMO is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025 | -0.09 |
The correlation between CVNY and XOMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVNY vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank
CVNY
XOMO
CVNY vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVNY | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.28 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 2.28 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | 6.30 | -6.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVNY | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | 1.56 | -1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.37 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
CVNY vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVNY drawdown since its inception was -43.27%, which is greater than XOMO's maximum drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVNY and XOMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVNY | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.27% | -18.90% | -24.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.27% | -13.73% | -22.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.00% | -10.83% | -15.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.50% | -7.22% | -6.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.10% | 4.96% | +11.14% |
Volatility
CVNY vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) has a higher volatility of 14.27% compared to YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) at 6.82%. This indicates that CVNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVNY | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.27% | 6.82% | +7.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.94% | 16.58% | +20.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.50% | 20.05% | +29.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.19% | 18.93% | +39.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.19% | 18.93% | +39.26% |
CVNY vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVNY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVNY vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison
CVNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 107.17%, more than XOMO's 35.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVNY YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF | 107.17% | 80.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 35.93% | 31.64% | 26.94% | 5.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVNY and XOMO have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CVNY has higher volatility (14.27%) compared to XOMO (6.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVNY dropped -43.27% vs XOMO's -18.90%.
On 1-year performance, XOMO leads with 31.19% vs -0.68% for CVNY. On fees, CVNY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, XOMO has been the lower-risk option at 6.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XOMO has performed better with a 31.19% return vs -0.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CVNY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.
CVNY has the higher dividend yield at 107.17%, compared with 35.93% for XOMO.
Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CVNY and 1.01% for XOMO.
XOMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVNY and XOMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer