PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVNY vs. MSFO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVNY vs. MSFO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) and YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVNY achieves a -16.15% return, which is significantly lower than MSFO's 0.49% return.


CVNY

1D
5.45%
1M
-0.72%
6M
-12.62%
YTD
-16.15%
1Y
-3.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.55%

MSFO

1D
4.63%
1M
20.78%
6M
12.36%
YTD
0.49%
1Y
-3.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$343.61K$342.30K$714.98K
$1.07M$907.81K$1.05M

CVNY vs. MSFO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CVNY and MSFO is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2025

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVNY vs. MSFO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CVNY
CVNY Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
CVNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVNY Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CVNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVNY Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFO
MSFO Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MSFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFO Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CVNY vs. MSFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) and YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVNYMSFODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.00

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

-0.13

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.19

-0.24

+0.05

CVNY vs. MSFO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVNY Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is higher than the MSFO Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVNY and MSFO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVNY vs. MSFO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVNY drawdown since its inception was -43.27%, which is greater than MSFO's maximum drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVNY and MSFO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVNYMSFODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.27%

-29.65%

-13.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.27%

-29.65%

-6.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.54%

-7.92%

-16.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.71%

-7.46%

-7.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.77%

16.15%

+2.62%

Volatility

CVNY vs. MSFO - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) has a higher volatility of 15.14% compared to YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) at 14.36%. This indicates that CVNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVNYMSFODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.14%

14.36%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.85%

23.34%

+11.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.05%

27.74%

+22.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.49%

21.90%

+35.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.49%

21.90%

+35.59%

CVNY vs. MSFO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVNY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFO's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVNY vs. MSFO - Dividend Comparison

CVNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 110.82%, more than MSFO's 34.78% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CVNY
YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF
110.82%80.86%0.00%0.00%
MSFO
YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
34.78%33.91%35.15%6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVNY and MSFO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVNY has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to MSFO (14.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVNY dropped -43.27% vs MSFO's -29.65%.

On 1-year performance, CVNY leads with -3.53% vs -3.86% for MSFO. On fees, CVNY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, MSFO has been the lower-risk option at 14.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CVNY has performed better with a -3.53% return vs -3.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CVNY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for MSFO.

CVNY has the higher dividend yield at 110.82%, compared with 34.78% for MSFO.

CVNY is categorized as Derivative Income, while MSFO is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CVNY and 1.03% for MSFO.

CVNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.07 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVNY and MSFO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer