PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVNY vs. MSFO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CVNY vs. MSFO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) and YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CVNY vs. MSFO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVNY achieves a -23.00% return, which is significantly lower than MSFO's -20.13% return.


CVNY

1D
6.57%
1M
-5.43%
YTD
-23.00%
6M
-13.73%
1Y
42.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSFO

1D
3.31%
1M
-5.14%
YTD
-20.13%
6M
-23.41%
1Y
0.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CVNY vs. MSFO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CVNY and MSFO have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Return for Risk

CVNY vs. MSFO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVNY
CVNY Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CVNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVNY Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CVNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVNY Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFO
MSFO Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
MSFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFO Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFO Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVNY vs. MSFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) and YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVNYMSFODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.76

0.04

+0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.29

0.22

+1.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.03

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

-0.00

+1.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.38

-0.00

+3.38

CVNY vs. MSFO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the MSFO Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVNY and MSFO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVNYMSFODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

0.04

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.40

-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between CVNY and MSFO is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CVNY vs. MSFO - Dividend Comparison

CVNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 120.87%, more than MSFO's 44.19% yield.


TTM202520242023
CVNY
YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF
120.87%80.86%0.00%0.00%
MSFO
YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
44.19%33.91%35.15%6.44%

Drawdowns

CVNY vs. MSFO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVNY drawdown since its inception was -43.27%, which is greater than MSFO's maximum drawdown of -29.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVNY and MSFO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CVNYMSFODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.27%

-29.29%

-13.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.27%

-29.29%

-6.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.71%

-26.82%

-3.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.27%

-5.72%

-6.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.41%

10.45%

+2.96%

Volatility

CVNY vs. MSFO - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) has a higher volatility of 14.67% compared to YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) at 5.94%. This indicates that CVNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CVNYMSFODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.67%

5.94%

+8.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.28%

16.67%

+23.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.69%

22.29%

+34.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.06%

19.15%

+40.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.06%

19.15%

+40.91%