PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVNY vs. QQQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVNY vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVNY achieves a -19.40% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 13.63% return.


CVNY

1D
-6.51%
1M
-12.32%
YTD
-19.40%
6M
-12.07%
1Y
0.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQI

1D
0.38%
1M
6.99%
YTD
13.63%
6M
13.39%
1Y
31.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVNY vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CVNY and QQQI is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVNY vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVNY
CVNY Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
CVNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVNY Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
CVNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVNY Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVNY vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVNYQQQIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.01

2.44

-2.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.36

3.21

-2.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.45

-0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

3.34

-3.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.10

15.01

-14.91

CVNY vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVNY and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVNYQQQIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

2.44

-2.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

1.34

-1.04

Drawdowns

CVNY vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVNY drawdown since its inception was -43.27%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVNY and QQQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVNYQQQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.27%

-20.00%

-23.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.27%

-9.61%

-26.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.47%

0.00%

-27.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.38%

-2.20%

-11.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.82%

2.14%

+13.68%

Volatility

CVNY vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) has a higher volatility of 13.57% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 2.67%. This indicates that CVNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVNYQQQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.57%

2.67%

+10.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.73%

9.85%

+26.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.33%

12.98%

+36.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.29%

17.08%

+41.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.29%

17.08%

+41.21%

CVNY vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVNY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVNY vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

CVNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 106.45%, more than QQQI's 13.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CVNY
YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF
106.45%80.86%0.00%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.17%13.82%12.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVNY and QQQI have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVNY has higher volatility (13.57%) compared to QQQI (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVNY dropped -43.27% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

On 1-year performance, QQQI leads with 31.46% vs 0.44% for CVNY. On fees, QQQI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQI has performed better with a 31.46% return vs 0.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CVNY.

CVNY has the higher dividend yield at 106.45%, compared with 13.17% for QQQI.

CVNY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CVNY and 0.68% for QQQI.

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVNY and QQQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer