CVNY vs. QQQI
CVNY (YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CVNY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CVNY returned 0.44% vs 31.46% for QQQI. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CVNY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.
Performance
CVNY vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVNY achieves a -19.40% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 13.63% return.
CVNY
- 1D
- -6.51%
- 1M
- -12.32%
- YTD
- -19.40%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 0.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQI
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 6.99%
- YTD
- 13.63%
- 6M
- 13.39%
- 1Y
- 31.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVNY vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CVNY YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF | -19.40% | 54.11% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.63% | 15.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVNY and QQQI is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVNY vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
CVNY
QQQI
CVNY vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVNY | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.01 | 2.44 | -2.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.36 | 3.21 | -2.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.45 | -0.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 3.34 | -3.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.10 | 15.01 | -14.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVNY | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 | 2.44 | -2.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 1.34 | -1.04 |
Drawdowns
CVNY vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVNY drawdown since its inception was -43.27%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVNY and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVNY | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.27% | -20.00% | -23.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.27% | -9.61% | -26.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.47% | 0.00% | -27.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.38% | -2.20% | -11.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.82% | 2.14% | +13.68% |
Volatility
CVNY vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) has a higher volatility of 13.57% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 2.67%. This indicates that CVNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVNY | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.57% | 2.67% | +10.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.73% | 9.85% | +26.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.33% | 12.98% | +36.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.29% | 17.08% | +41.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.29% | 17.08% | +41.21% |
CVNY vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVNY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVNY vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
CVNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 106.45%, more than QQQI's 13.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CVNY YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF | 106.45% | 80.86% | 0.00% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.17% | 13.82% | 12.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVNY and QQQI have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CVNY has higher volatility (13.57%) compared to QQQI (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVNY dropped -43.27% vs QQQI's -20.00%.
On 1-year performance, QQQI leads with 31.46% vs 0.44% for CVNY. On fees, QQQI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQI has performed better with a 31.46% return vs 0.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CVNY.
CVNY has the higher dividend yield at 106.45%, compared with 13.17% for QQQI.
CVNY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CVNY and 0.68% for QQQI.
QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVNY and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer