CVNY vs. BABO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) and YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO).

CVNY and BABO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CVNY is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Jan 29, 2025. BABO is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Aug 7, 2024.

Performance

CVNY vs. BABO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) and YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CVNY vs. BABO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CVNY YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF	-23.00%	54.11%
BABO YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF	-12.67%	28.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVNY achieves a -23.00% return, which is significantly lower than BABO's -12.67% return.

CVNY

• 1D: 6.57%
• 1M: -5.43%
• YTD: -23.00%
• 6M: -13.73%
• 1Y: 42.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BABO

• 1D: 2.67%
• 1M: -10.26%
• YTD: -12.67%
• 6M: -23.73%
• 1Y: -6.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVNY vs. BABO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CVNY and BABO have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

CVNY

YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF

BABO

YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF

Return for Risk

CVNY vs. BABO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVNY

CVNY Risk / Return Rank: 45
CVNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
CVNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
CVNY Omega Ratio Rank: 47
CVNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
CVNY Martin Ratio Rank: 37

BABO

BABO Risk / Return Rank: 9
BABO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
BABO Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BABO Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BABO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
BABO Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVNY vs. BABO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) and YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CVNY	BABO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	-0.18	+0.94
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	0.00	+1.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.00	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.25	-0.23	+1.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.38	-0.52	+3.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CVNY vs. BABO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the BABO Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVNY and BABO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CVNY	BABO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76	-0.18	+0.94
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.44	-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between CVNY and BABO is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CVNY vs. BABO - Dividend Comparison

CVNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 120.87%, more than BABO's 87.67% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
CVNY YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF	120.87%	80.86%	0.00%
BABO YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF	87.67%	85.50%	20.65%

Drawdowns

CVNY vs. BABO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVNY drawdown since its inception was -43.27%, which is greater than BABO's maximum drawdown of -29.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVNY and BABO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVNY	BABO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.27%	-29.26%	-14.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.27%	-28.85%	-7.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.71%	-26.64%	-4.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.27%	-12.54%	+0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.41%	12.93%	+0.48%

Volatility

CVNY vs. BABO - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) has a higher volatility of 14.67% compared to YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) at 10.87%. This indicates that CVNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BABO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVNY	BABO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.67%	10.87%	+3.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.28%	24.93%	+15.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.69%	37.51%	+19.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.06%	36.96%	+23.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.06%	36.96%	+23.10%