CVBF vs. TGB
CVBF (CVB Financial Corp.) and TGB (Taseko Mines Limited) are both stocks. CVBF operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while TGB operates in Copper (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, CVBF returned 7.01%/yr vs 27.87%/yr for TGB. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CVBF vs. TGB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVBF achieves a 22.63% return, which is significantly higher than TGB's 19.61% return. Over the past 10 years, CVBF has underperformed TGB with an annualized return of 7.01%, while TGB has yielded a comparatively higher 27.87% annualized return.
CVBF
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- 6M
- 15.72%
- YTD
- 22.63%
- 1Y
- 26.79%
- 3Y*
- 10.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- 7.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.27%
TGB
- 1D
- -4.38%
- 1M
- -2.31%
- 6M
- -11.15%
- YTD
- 19.61%
- 1Y
- 119.81%
- 3Y*
- 67.52%
- 5Y*
- 30.19%
- 10Y*
- 27.87%
- ALL TIME*
- -1.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $36.51M | $34.46M | $34.59M | |
| $45.56M | $40.91M | $37.62M |
CVBF vs. TGB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVBF CVB Financial Corp. | 22.63% | -9.45% | 11.94% | -18.47% | 24.02% | 13.58% | -5.25% | 10.19% | -11.98% | 5.10% |
TGB Taseko Mines Limited | 19.61% | 191.75% | 38.57% | -4.76% | -28.29% | 55.30% | 175.00% | 1.48% | -79.70% | 173.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVBF and TGB is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 1994 | 0.14 |
The correlation between CVBF and TGB shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.21 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CVBF:
$3.21B
TGB:
$2.48B
CVBF:
$1.52
TGB:
CA$0.04
CVBF:
14.76
TGB:
213.12
CVBF:
4.33
TGB:
4.26
CVBF:
0.96
TGB:
4.26
CVBF:
$705.95M
TGB:
CA$768.31M
CVBF:
$565.11M
TGB:
CA$240.15M
CVBF:
$287.60M
TGB:
CA$244.74M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVBF vs. TGB — Risk / Return Rank
CVBF
TGB
CVBF vs. TGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) and Taseko Mines Limited (TGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CVBF | TGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.29 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 3.42 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.47 | 8.21 | -3.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CVBF vs. TGB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVBF drawdown since its inception was -63.35%, smaller than the maximum TGB drawdown of -98.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVBF and TGB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVBF | TGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.35% | -98.58% | +35.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.25% | -35.47% | +22.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.23% | -44.26% | +14.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.74% | -61.92% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.74% | -90.76% | +29.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.16% | -50.76% | +41.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.09% | -81.22% | +65.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.52% | 14.74% | -9.22% |
Volatility
CVBF vs. TGB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) is 5.48%, while Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) has a volatility of 25.35%. This indicates that CVBF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVBF | TGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 25.35% | -19.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.38% | 55.61% | -39.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.09% | 67.62% | -42.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.48% | 63.46% | -30.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.26% | 66.15% | -33.89% |
Dividends
CVBF vs. TGB - Dividend Comparison
CVBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, while TGB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVBF CVB Financial Corp. | 3.58% | 4.30% | 4.67% | 2.97% | 2.99% | 3.36% | 4.62% | 3.15% | 2.77% | 2.21% | 1.57% | 2.84% |
TGB Taseko Mines Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CVBF vs. TGB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CVB Financial Corp. and Taseko Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CVBF vs. TGB - Profitability Comparison
CVBF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CVB Financial Corp. reported a gross profit of 179.43M and revenue of 219.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.
TGB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 81.37M and revenue of 234.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.7%.
CVBF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CVB Financial Corp. reported an operating income of 65.05M and revenue of 219.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.7%.
TGB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported an operating income of 66.76M and revenue of 234.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.5%.
CVBF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CVB Financial Corp. reported a net income of 48.26M and revenue of 219.14M, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.
TGB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported a net income of 16.89M and revenue of 234.55M, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CVBF and TGB have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TGB has higher volatility (25.35%) compared to CVBF (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVBF dropped -63.35% vs TGB's -98.58%.
TGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVBF and TGB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer