CVBF vs. MP

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CVBF (CVB Financial Corp.) and MP (MP Materials Corp.) are both stocks. CVBF operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while MP operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, CVBF returned 4.11%/yr vs 12.18%/yr for MP. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CVBF vs. MP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) and MP Materials Corp. (MP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVBF achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly lower than MP's 19.34% return.

CVBF

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: 3.44%
• YTD: 14.35%
• 6M: 9.86%
• 1Y: 18.54%
• 3Y*: 22.84%
• 5Y*: 4.11%
• 10Y*: 6.38%

MP

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: -6.47%
• YTD: 19.34%
• 6M: 10.85%
• 1Y: 59.75%
• 3Y*: 41.13%
• 5Y*: 12.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVBF vs. MP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CVBF CVB Financial Corp.	14.35%	-9.45%	11.94%	-18.47%	24.02%	13.58%	6.47%
MP MP Materials Corp.	19.34%	223.85%	-21.41%	-18.25%	-46.54%	41.19%	224.95%

Correlation

The correlation between CVBF and MP is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2020	0.24

The correlation between CVBF and MP shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS CVBF : $2.02 MP : -$0.53
PS Ratio CVBF : 4.21 MP : 26.57
Total Revenue (TTM) CVBF : $517.00M MP : $305.30M
Gross Profit (TTM) CVBF : $385.67M MP : $25.30M
EBITDA (TTM) CVBF : $288.24M MP : $1.52M

Return for Risk

CVBF vs. MP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVBF

CVBF Risk / Return Rank: 63
CVBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
CVBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
CVBF Omega Ratio Rank: 57
CVBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
CVBF Martin Ratio Rank: 65

MP

MP Risk / Return Rank: 65
MP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
MP Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
MP Omega Ratio Rank: 66
MP Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
MP Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVBF vs. MP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) and MP Materials Corp. (MP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CVBF	MP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	0.65	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.17	1.71	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.19	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	1.12	+0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.54	1.84	+0.70

CVBF vs. MP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVBF Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the MP Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVBF and MP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CVBF vs. MP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVBF drawdown since its inception was -63.35%, smaller than the maximum MP drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVBF and MP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVBF	MP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.35%	-81.99%	+18.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.91%	-53.79%	+39.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.23%	-59.47%	+29.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.74%	-81.99%	+20.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.29%	-38.88%	+23.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.12%	-42.58%	+26.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.31%	32.64%	-25.33%

Volatility

CVBF vs. MP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) is 7.24%, while MP Materials Corp. (MP) has a volatility of 22.62%. This indicates that CVBF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVBF	MP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.24%	22.62%	-15.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.70%	51.35%	-33.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.11%	91.87%	-65.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.56%	69.62%	-37.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.40%	72.59%	-40.19%

Dividends

CVBF vs. MP - Dividend Comparison

CVBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, while MP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CVBF CVB Financial Corp.	3.80%	4.30%	4.67%	2.97%	2.99%	3.36%	4.62%	3.15%	2.77%	2.21%	1.57%	2.84%
MP MP Materials Corp.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CVBF and MP in my portfolio?

CVBF and MP have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CVBF or MP?

MP has higher volatility (22.62%) compared to CVBF (7.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVBF dropped -63.35% vs MP's -81.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CVBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.