CVBF vs. MP
CVBF (CVB Financial Corp.) and MP (MP Materials Corp.) are both stocks. CVBF operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while MP operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, CVBF returned 7.51%/yr vs 1.92%/yr for MP. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CVBF vs. MP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVBF achieves a 22.63% return, which is significantly higher than MP's -18.11% return.
CVBF
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- 6M
- 15.72%
- YTD
- 22.63%
- 1Y
- 26.79%
- 3Y*
- 10.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- 7.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.27%
MP
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -22.40%
- 6M
- -29.61%
- YTD
- -18.11%
- 1Y
- -35.04%
- 3Y*
- 21.47%
- 5Y*
- 1.92%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $36.51M | $34.46M | $34.59M | |
| $269.01M | $254.79M | $346.46M |
CVBF vs. MP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVBF CVB Financial Corp. | 22.63% | -9.45% | 11.94% | -18.47% | 24.02% | 13.58% | 6.47% |
MP MP Materials Corp. | -18.11% | 223.85% | -21.41% | -18.25% | -46.54% | 41.19% | 224.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVBF and MP is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2020 | 0.22 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CVBF and MP has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.22, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
CVBF:
$3.21B
MP:
$7.36B
CVBF:
$1.52
MP:
-$0.57
CVBF:
4.33
MP:
16.91
CVBF:
$705.95M
MP:
$305.30M
CVBF:
$565.11M
MP:
$25.30M
CVBF:
$287.60M
MP:
$1.52M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVBF vs. MP — Risk / Return Rank
CVBF
MP
CVBF vs. MP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) and MP Materials Corp. (MP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CVBF | MP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.97 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | -0.54 | +2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.47 | -0.90 | +5.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CVBF vs. MP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVBF drawdown since its inception was -63.35%, smaller than the maximum MP drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVBF and MP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVBF | MP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.35% | -81.99% | +18.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.25% | -61.38% | +48.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.23% | -61.38% | +31.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.74% | -81.99% | +20.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.16% | -58.06% | +48.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.09% | -42.72% | +26.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.52% | 36.61% | -31.09% |
Volatility
CVBF vs. MP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) is 5.48%, while MP Materials Corp. (MP) has a volatility of 20.22%. This indicates that CVBF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVBF | MP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 20.22% | -14.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.38% | 50.61% | -34.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.09% | 74.63% | -49.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.48% | 69.99% | -37.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.26% | 72.47% | -40.21% |
Dividends
CVBF vs. MP - Dividend Comparison
CVBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, while MP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVBF CVB Financial Corp. | 3.58% | 4.30% | 4.67% | 2.97% | 2.99% | 3.36% | 4.62% | 3.15% | 2.77% | 2.21% | 1.57% | 2.84% |
MP MP Materials Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CVBF vs. MP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CVB Financial Corp. and MP Materials Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CVBF vs. MP - Profitability Comparison
CVBF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CVB Financial Corp. reported a gross profit of 179.43M and revenue of 219.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.
MP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 90.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CVBF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CVB Financial Corp. reported an operating income of 65.05M and revenue of 219.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.7%.
MP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 90.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
CVBF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CVB Financial Corp. reported a net income of 48.26M and revenue of 219.14M, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.
MP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported a net income of -7.97M and revenue of 90.65M, resulting in a net margin of -8.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CVBF and MP have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MP has higher volatility (20.22%) compared to CVBF (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVBF dropped -63.35% vs MP's -81.99%.
CVBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVBF and MP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer