CSUAY vs. MNST
CSUAY (China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd) and MNST (Monster Beverage Corporation) are both stocks. CSUAY operates in Thermal Coal (Energy), while MNST operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, CSUAY returned 23.22%/yr vs 13.77%/yr for MNST. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CSUAY vs. MNST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSUAY achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly lower than MNST's 27.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CSUAY has outperformed MNST with an annualized return of 23.22%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively lower 13.77% annualized return.
CSUAY
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 7.89%
- 1Y
- 39.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.08%
- 5Y*
- 33.17%
- 10Y*
- 23.22%
MNST
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- 6M
- 25.92%
- YTD
- 27.02%
- 1Y
- 65.54%
- 3Y*
- 20.59%
- 5Y*
- 16.64%
- 10Y*
- 13.77%
CSUAY vs. MNST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAY China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd | 7.89% | 28.25% | 34.09% | 34.21% | 38.61% | 40.38% | -2.68% | 1.33% | -12.77% | 96.35% |
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 27.02% | 45.87% | -8.77% | 13.48% | 5.72% | 3.85% | 45.52% | 29.11% | -22.23% | 42.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUAY and MNST is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2008 | 0.12 |
The correlation between CSUAY and MNST shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (3 years) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CSUAY:
$103.76B
MNST:
$95.25B
CSUAY:
CN¥10.37
MNST:
$2.06
CSUAY:
13.58
MNST:
47.29
CSUAY:
4.10
MNST:
3.70
CSUAY:
2.38
MNST:
10.93
CSUAY:
1.47
MNST:
11.03
CSUAY:
CN¥295.34B
MNST:
$8.79B
CSUAY:
CN¥99.19B
MNST:
$4.88B
CSUAY:
CN¥79.63B
MNST:
$2.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSUAY vs. MNST — Risk / Return Rank
CSUAY
MNST
CSUAY vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd (CSUAY) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSUAY | MNST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.48 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 3.67 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.37 | 10.97 | -5.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSUAY vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUAY drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, which is greater than MNST's maximum drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUAY and MNST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUAY | MNST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.12% | -69.17% | -18.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.69% | -17.70% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.14% | -26.04% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.14% | -26.62% | +2.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.27% | -30.42% | -14.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.64% | -0.26% | -15.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.96% | -20.61% | -26.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.75% | 5.91% | +1.84% |
Volatility
CSUAY vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison
China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd (CSUAY) has a higher volatility of 10.49% compared to Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) at 4.75%. This indicates that CSUAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSUAY | MNST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.49% | 4.75% | +5.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.71% | 20.04% | +4.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.05% | 26.10% | +11.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.15% | 24.64% | +8.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.48% | 26.25% | +6.23% |
Dividends
CSUAY vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison
CSUAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, while MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAY China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd | 5.58% | 9.11% | 7.29% | 10.66% | 13.21% | 10.39% | 7.89% | 5.07% | 5.46% | 29.22% | 5.13% | 8.19% |
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CSUAY vs. MNST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CSUAY vs. MNST - Profitability Comparison
CSUAY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd reported a gross profit of 23.15B and revenue of 70.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.9%.
MNST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.29B and revenue of 2.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.0%.
CSUAY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd reported an operating income of 16.47B and revenue of 70.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.4%.
MNST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported an operating income of 729.96M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.
CSUAY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd reported a net income of 10.67B and revenue of 70.40B, resulting in a net margin of 15.2%.
MNST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a net income of 569.49M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in a net margin of 24.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSUAY and MNST have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSUAY has higher volatility (10.49%) compared to MNST (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSUAY dropped -88.12% vs MNST's -69.17%.
MNST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSUAY and MNST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer