PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSUAY vs. TTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CSUAY vs. TTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd (CSUAY) and TotalEnergies SE (TTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSUAY achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly lower than TTE's 24.08% return. Over the past 10 years, CSUAY has outperformed TTE with an annualized return of 24.99%, while TTE has yielded a comparatively lower 16.60% annualized return.


CSUAY

1D
-1.37%
1M
-4.39%
YTD
8.51%
6M
7.00%
1Y
36.05%
3Y*
29.62%
5Y*
32.21%
10Y*
24.99%

TTE

1D
-0.45%
1M
-12.33%
YTD
24.08%
6M
24.86%
1Y
34.92%
3Y*
19.88%
5Y*
19.41%
10Y*
16.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSUAY vs. TTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd
8.51%28.25%34.09%34.21%38.61%40.38%-2.68%1.33%-12.77%96.35%
TTE
TotalEnergies SE
24.08%31.96%-11.58%10.48%37.55%56.52%-9.98%15.41%-2.56%12.42%

Correlation

The correlation between CSUAY and TTE is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2008

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CSUAY:

$108.43B

TTE:

$173.79B

EPS

CSUAY:

CN¥10.38

TTE:

$6.84

PE Ratio

CSUAY:

14.08

TTE:

11.73

PEG Ratio

CSUAY:

4.25

TTE:

9.96

PS Ratio

CSUAY:

2.47

TTE:

0.96

PB Ratio

CSUAY:

1.53

TTE:

1.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

CSUAY:

CN¥295.34B

TTE:

$183.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CSUAY:

CN¥99.19B

TTE:

$61.59B

EBITDA (TTM)

CSUAY:

CN¥79.63B

TTE:

$37.85B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSUAY vs. TTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSUAY
CSUAY Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CSUAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSUAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSUAY Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CSUAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSUAY Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

TTE
TTE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
TTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
TTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSUAY vs. TTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd (CSUAY) and TotalEnergies SE (TTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSUAYTTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.24

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

2.47

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.27

8.78

-3.51

CSUAY vs. TTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSUAY Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the TTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSUAY and TTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSUAY vs. TTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSUAY drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, which is greater than TTE's maximum drawdown of -62.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUAY and TTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSUAYTTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.12%

-62.81%

-25.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.57%

-14.20%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.14%

-24.51%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.14%

-24.95%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.27%

-62.81%

+17.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.16%

-14.20%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.05%

-18.95%

-28.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.88%

4.00%

+2.88%

Volatility

CSUAY vs. TTE - Volatility Comparison

China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd (CSUAY) has a higher volatility of 10.06% compared to TotalEnergies SE (TTE) at 7.11%. This indicates that CSUAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSUAYTTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.06%

7.11%

+2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.73%

18.98%

+4.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.37%

25.59%

+11.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.03%

35.45%

-2.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.45%

37.51%

-5.06%

Dividends

CSUAY vs. TTE - Dividend Comparison

CSUAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.39%, more than TTE's 3.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd
8.39%9.11%7.29%10.66%13.21%10.39%7.89%5.07%5.46%29.22%5.13%8.19%
TTE
TotalEnergies SE
3.69%9.64%9.09%4.60%8.41%27.22%10.10%6.52%4.07%4.51%4.77%5.46%

Financials

CSUAY vs. TTE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd and TotalEnergies SE. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B80.00B90.00B100.00B20222023202420252026
70.40B
48.90B
(CSUAY) Total Revenue
(TTE) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CSUAY values in CNY, TTE values in USD

CSUAY vs. TTE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd and TotalEnergies SE over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
32.9%
20.5%
Portfolio components
CSUAY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd reported a gross profit of 23.15B and revenue of 70.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.9%.

TTE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TotalEnergies SE reported a gross profit of 10.03B and revenue of 48.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.5%.

CSUAY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd reported an operating income of 16.47B and revenue of 70.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.4%.

TTE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TotalEnergies SE reported an operating income of 10.03B and revenue of 48.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.

CSUAY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd reported a net income of 10.67B and revenue of 70.40B, resulting in a net margin of 15.2%.

TTE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TotalEnergies SE reported a net income of 5.74B and revenue of 48.90B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CSUAY and TTE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSUAY has higher volatility (10.06%) compared to TTE (7.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSUAY dropped -88.12% vs TTE's -62.81%.

TTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSUAY and TTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer