PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSUAY vs. PSCE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSUAY vs. PSCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd (CSUAY) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSUAY achieves a 15.12% return, which is significantly lower than PSCE's 35.93% return. Over the past 10 years, CSUAY has outperformed PSCE with an annualized return of 24.16%, while PSCE has yielded a comparatively lower -1.41% annualized return.


CSUAY

1D
-0.45%
1M
5.72%
6M
4.16%
YTD
15.12%
1Y
37.78%
3Y*
31.53%
5Y*
35.26%
10Y*
24.16%
ALL TIME*
8.42%

PSCE

1D
1.76%
1M
7.67%
6M
15.91%
YTD
35.93%
1Y
55.62%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
13.60%
10Y*
-1.41%
ALL TIME*
-3.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$396.21K$537.81K$518.98K
$1.43M$1.38M$1.78M

CSUAY vs. PSCE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd
15.12%28.25%34.09%34.21%38.61%40.38%-2.68%1.33%-12.77%96.35%
PSCE
Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF
35.93%-9.00%-5.47%5.07%48.45%59.85%-40.31%-14.93%-42.98%-26.70%

Correlation

The correlation between CSUAY and PSCE is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSUAY vs. PSCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CSUAY
CSUAY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CSUAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSUAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSUAY Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CSUAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSUAY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCE
PSCE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PSCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CSUAY vs. PSCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd (CSUAY) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSUAYPSCEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.29

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

3.04

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.31

9.13

-4.82

CSUAY vs. PSCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSUAY Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the PSCE Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSUAY and PSCE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSUAY vs. PSCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSUAY drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, smaller than the maximum PSCE drawdown of -96.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUAY and PSCE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSUAYPSCEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.12%

-96.21%

+8.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.69%

-16.17%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.14%

-44.57%

+20.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.14%

-45.42%

+21.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.27%

-90.70%

+45.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.99%

-75.85%

+65.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.84%

-58.99%

+12.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.21%

5.39%

+2.82%

Volatility

CSUAY vs. PSCE - Volatility Comparison

China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd (CSUAY) has a higher volatility of 9.88% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE) at 8.68%. This indicates that CSUAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSUAYPSCEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.88%

8.68%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.83%

20.04%

+4.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.91%

27.41%

+10.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.29%

36.95%

-3.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.47%

43.02%

-10.55%

Dividends

CSUAY vs. PSCE - Dividend Comparison

CSUAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, more than PSCE's 2.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd
5.23%9.11%7.29%10.66%13.21%10.39%7.89%5.07%5.46%29.22%5.13%8.19%
PSCE
Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF
2.22%2.39%1.70%2.57%1.70%0.46%0.87%0.14%0.22%0.04%0.22%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSUAY and PSCE have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSUAY has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to PSCE (8.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSUAY dropped -88.12% vs PSCE's -96.21%.

PSCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSUAY and PSCE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer