CSRE vs. FPRO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CSRE (Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF) and FPRO (Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF) are both REIT funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CSRE returned 16.49% vs 17.24% for FPRO. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CSRE charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FPRO.

Performance

CSRE vs. FPRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) and Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSRE having a 15.74% return and FPRO slightly higher at 16.14%.

CSRE

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 1.28%
• 6M: 13.66%
• YTD: 15.74%
• 1Y: 16.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.47%

FPRO

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 1.59%
• 6M: 13.72%
• YTD: 16.14%
• 1Y: 17.24%
• 3Y*: 10.99%
• 5Y*: 3.29%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CSRE Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF	$3.71M	$3.33M	$3.84M
FPRO Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF	$89.69K	$152.37K	$130.11K

CSRE vs. FPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CSRE Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF	15.74%	4.30%
FPRO Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF	16.14%	1.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CSRE and FPRO is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025	0.93

The correlation between CSRE and FPRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CSRE vs. FPRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CSRE

CSRE Risk / Return Rank: 48
CSRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
CSRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
CSRE Omega Ratio Rank: 42
CSRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
CSRE Martin Ratio Rank: 57

FPRO

FPRO Risk / Return Rank: 53
FPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
FPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
FPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CSRE vs. FPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) and Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CSRE	FPRO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	1.27	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	1.82	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.22	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	2.26	-0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.23	7.00	+0.24

CSRE vs. FPRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the FPRO Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSRE and FPRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CSRE vs. FPRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSRE drawdown since its inception was -13.03%, smaller than the maximum FPRO drawdown of -32.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSRE and FPRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSRE	FPRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.03%	-32.81%	+19.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.44%	-7.67%	-0.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.01%	-1.62%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.14%	-12.30%	+10.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.28%	2.47%	-0.19%

Volatility

CSRE vs. FPRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) is 3.75%, while Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that CSRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSRE	FPRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.75%	4.28%	-0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.64%	10.42%	+0.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.57%	13.68%	-0.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.48%	18.71%	-3.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.48%	18.31%	-2.83%

CSRE vs. FPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSRE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FPRO's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSRE vs. FPRO - Dividend Comparison

CSRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than FPRO's 2.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CSRE Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF	2.14%	2.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FPRO Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF	2.44%	2.69%	2.50%	2.83%	2.67%	1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSRE and FPRO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, CSRE and FPRO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CSRE or FPRO?

FPRO has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to CSRE (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSRE dropped -13.03% vs FPRO's -32.81%.

Which ETF is better, CSRE or FPRO?

On 1-year performance, FPRO leads with 17.24% vs 16.49% for CSRE. On fees, FPRO is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, CSRE has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CSRE or FPRO?

Over the 1-year period, FPRO has performed better with a 17.24% return vs 16.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSRE or FPRO?

FPRO is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CSRE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSRE or FPRO?

FPRO has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 2.14% for CSRE.

What is the main difference between CSRE and FPRO?

They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CSRE and 0.59% for FPRO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.