PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSRE vs. FPRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSRE vs. FPRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) and Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSRE having a 9.87% return and FPRO slightly higher at 9.97%.


CSRE

1D
-0.20%
1M
-1.86%
YTD
9.87%
6M
8.55%
1Y
10.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FPRO

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
9.97%
6M
9.24%
1Y
10.32%
3Y*
9.14%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSRE vs. FPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CSRE and FPRO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025

0.93

The correlation between CSRE and FPRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSRE vs. FPRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSRE
CSRE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CSRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSRE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CSRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSRE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

FPRO
FPRO Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSRE vs. FPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) and Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSREFPRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.14

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

1.35

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.17

3.88

+0.30

CSRE vs. FPRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSRE Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the FPRO Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSRE and FPRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSREFPRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

0.79

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.35

+0.30

Drawdowns

CSRE vs. FPRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSRE drawdown since its inception was -13.03%, smaller than the maximum FPRO drawdown of -32.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSRE and FPRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSREFPRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.03%

-32.81%

+19.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-7.67%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.46%

-2.73%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-12.66%

+10.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

2.67%

-0.06%

Volatility

CSRE vs. FPRO - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) and Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO) have volatilities of 3.56% and 3.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSREFPRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

3.54%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

9.13%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

13.10%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.45%

18.62%

-3.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.45%

18.37%

-2.92%

CSRE vs. FPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSRE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FPRO's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSRE vs. FPRO - Dividend Comparison

CSRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than FPRO's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CSRE
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF
2.30%2.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FPRO
Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF
2.57%2.69%2.50%2.83%2.67%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, CSRE and FPRO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CSRE has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to FPRO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSRE dropped -13.03% vs FPRO's -32.81%.

On 1-year performance, CSRE leads with 10.86% vs 10.32% for FPRO. On fees, FPRO is cheaper at 0.59% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CSRE has performed better with a 10.86% return vs 10.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FPRO is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CSRE.

FPRO has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 2.30% for CSRE.

They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CSRE and 0.59% for FPRO.

CSRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSRE and FPRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer