PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPRO vs. AOMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPRO vs. AOMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO) and Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc. (AOMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPRO achieves a 12.54% return, which is significantly higher than AOMR's 8.52% return.


FPRO

1D
0.99%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
12.54%
6M
13.23%
1Y
12.34%
3Y*
11.04%
5Y*
3.47%
10Y*

AOMR

1D
2.60%
1M
6.64%
YTD
8.52%
6M
6.54%
1Y
10.79%
3Y*
18.20%
5Y*
-2.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPRO vs. AOMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FPRO
Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF
12.54%2.60%5.63%10.93%-25.02%16.53%
AOMR
Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc.
8.52%6.20%-1.89%159.86%-67.27%-10.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FPRO and AOMR is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021

0.36

The correlation between FPRO and AOMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (5 years) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPRO vs. AOMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPRO
FPRO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

AOMR
AOMR Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AOMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOMR Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
AOMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOMR Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPRO vs. AOMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO) and Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc. (AOMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FPROAOMRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.10

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

0.70

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.62

1.40

+3.22

FPRO vs. AOMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the AOMR Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPRO and AOMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FPRO vs. AOMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPRO drawdown since its inception was -32.81%, smaller than the maximum AOMR drawdown of -71.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPRO and AOMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPROAOMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.81%

-71.21%

+38.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.67%

-15.57%

+7.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.83%

-37.21%

+20.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.81%

-71.21%

+38.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

-14.34%

+12.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.54%

-23.36%

+10.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

7.73%

-5.05%

Volatility

FPRO vs. AOMR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO) is 4.80%, while Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc. (AOMR) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that FPRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPROAOMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

7.13%

-2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.92%

16.35%

-6.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.70%

23.96%

-10.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.67%

38.65%

-19.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.37%

38.61%

-20.24%

Dividends

FPRO vs. AOMR - Dividend Comparison

FPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than AOMR's 14.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AOMR
Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc.
14.76%14.87%13.79%12.08%35.31%2.93%
FPRO
Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF
2.52%2.69%2.50%2.83%2.67%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPRO and AOMR have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AOMR has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to FPRO (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPRO dropped -32.81% vs AOMR's -71.21%.

FPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPRO and AOMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer