CSIO vs. GXTG
CSIO (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF) and GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) are both Global Equities funds. CSIO is actively managed, while GXTG is passively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSIO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GXTG.
Performance
CSIO vs. GXTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSIO achieves a 15.22% return, which is significantly lower than GXTG's 18.88% return.
CSIO
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 15.22%
- 6M
- 15.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXTG
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 18.88%
- 6M
- 15.29%
- 1Y
- 16.72%
- 3Y*
- 4.52%
- 5Y*
- -9.71%
- 10Y*
- —
CSIO vs. GXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSIO Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF | 15.22% | 0.82% |
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 18.88% | -5.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSIO and GXTG is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSIO vs. GXTG — Risk / Return Rank
CSIO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GXTG
CSIO vs. GXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF (CSIO) and Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSIO | GXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.13 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.68 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSIO vs. GXTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSIO drawdown since its inception was -5.86%, smaller than the maximum GXTG drawdown of -67.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSIO and GXTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSIO | GXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.86% | -67.81% | +61.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -53.01% | +51.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.11% | -43.14% | +42.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.57% | — |
Volatility
CSIO vs. GXTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSIO | GXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.43% | 28.02% | -16.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.43% | 28.10% | -16.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.43% | 29.82% | -18.39% |
CSIO vs. GXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSIO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GXTG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSIO vs. GXTG - Dividend Comparison
CSIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than GXTG's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSIO Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.18% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSIO and GXTG have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXTG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXTG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSIO.
GXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.65% for CSIO.
They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CSIO and 0.50% for GXTG.
Find the right allocation for CSIO and GXTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer