CSIO vs. CSSD
CSIO (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF) and CSSD (Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSIO is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers, while CSSD is a Preferred Stock fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers. Both are actively managed. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CSIO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for CSSD.
Performance
CSIO vs. CSSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSIO achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly higher than CSSD's 3.22% return.
CSIO
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 10.64%
- YTD
- 15.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CSSD
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 3.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $425.11K | $287.65K | $411.11K | |
| $130.43K | $632.60K | $285.67K |
CSIO vs. CSSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSIO Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF | 15.82% | 0.82% |
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF | 3.22% | 0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSIO and CSSD is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSIO vs. CSSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF (CSIO) and Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF (CSSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSIO vs. CSSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSIO drawdown since its inception was -5.86%, which is greater than CSSD's maximum drawdown of -2.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSIO and CSSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSIO | CSSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.86% | -2.32% | -3.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -0.07% | -1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.08% | -0.28% | -0.80% |
Volatility
CSIO vs. CSSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSIO | CSSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.13% | 2.96% | +8.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.13% | 2.96% | +8.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.13% | 2.96% | +8.17% |
CSIO vs. CSSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSIO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CSSD's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSIO vs. CSSD - Dividend Comparison
CSIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than CSSD's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CSIO Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF | 1.46% | 0.00% |
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF | 3.63% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSIO and CSSD have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSSD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSSD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSIO.
CSSD has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 1.46% for CSIO.
CSIO is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while CSSD is Preferred Stock. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CSIO and 0.49% for CSSD.
Find the right allocation for CSIO and CSSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer