CSIO vs. CSNR
CSIO (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF) and CSNR (Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSIO is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers, while CSNR is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers. Both are actively managed. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CSIO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CSNR.
Performance
CSIO vs. CSNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSIO having a 15.82% return and CSNR slightly higher at 16.07%.
CSIO
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 10.64%
- YTD
- 15.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CSNR
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 5.45%
- 6M
- 4.56%
- YTD
- 16.07%
- 1Y
- 36.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 29.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $425.11K | $287.65K | $411.11K | |
| $436.61K | $371.64K | $760.40K |
CSIO vs. CSNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSIO Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF | 15.82% | 0.82% |
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF | 16.07% | 3.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSIO and CSNR is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSIO vs. CSNR — Risk / Return Rank
CSIO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CSNR
CSIO vs. CSNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF (CSIO) and Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSIO | CSNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSIO vs. CSNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSIO drawdown since its inception was -5.86%, smaller than the maximum CSNR drawdown of -15.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSIO and CSNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSIO | CSNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.86% | -15.33% | +9.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -6.12% | +4.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.08% | -2.50% | +1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.95% | — |
Volatility
CSIO vs. CSNR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSIO | CSNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.13% | 17.89% | -6.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.13% | 19.66% | -8.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.13% | 19.66% | -8.53% |
CSIO vs. CSNR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSIO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CSNR's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSIO vs. CSNR - Dividend Comparison
CSIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than CSNR's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CSIO Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF | 1.46% | 0.00% |
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF | 1.89% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSIO and CSNR have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSNR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSNR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSIO.
CSNR has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 1.46% for CSIO.
CSIO is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while CSNR is Natural Resources. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CSIO and 0.50% for CSNR.
Find the right allocation for CSIO and CSNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer