PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSD vs. SCHM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSD vs. SCHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSD achieves a 33.33% return, which is significantly higher than SCHM's 16.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CSD has outperformed SCHM with an annualized return of 13.22%, while SCHM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.84% annualized return.


CSD

1D
-0.25%
1M
-6.37%
6M
19.91%
YTD
33.33%
1Y
54.94%
3Y*
31.10%
5Y*
15.97%
10Y*
13.22%
ALL TIME*
9.93%

SCHM

1D
-0.26%
1M
-3.53%
6M
10.34%
YTD
16.02%
1Y
25.02%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
10.84%
ALL TIME*
11.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.08M$2.19M$2.22M
$34.02M$31.86M$37.33M

CSD vs. SCHM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
33.33%21.58%27.61%23.77%-15.04%13.01%10.79%20.61%-17.82%20.64%
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
16.02%10.17%11.98%16.69%-17.07%19.36%15.26%27.48%-8.77%19.60%

Correlation

The correlation between CSD and SCHM is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011

0.88

The correlation between CSD and SCHM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSD vs. SCHM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSD
SCHM

Industrials

35.5%
21.9%

Technology

23.5%
22.0%

Healthcare

12.8%
11.6%

Utilities

7.3%
2.9%

Basic Materials

6.8%
4.1%

Communication Services

5.2%
2.4%

Real Estate

3.8%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

2.4%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
3.4%

Financial Services

0.1%
11.1%

Energy

-

3.2%

Industrials

CSD
35.5%
SCHM
21.9%

Technology

CSD
23.5%
SCHM
22.0%

Healthcare

CSD
12.8%
SCHM
11.6%

Utilities

CSD
7.3%
SCHM
2.9%

Basic Materials

CSD
6.8%
SCHM
4.1%

Communication Services

CSD
5.2%
SCHM
2.4%

Real Estate

CSD
3.8%
SCHM
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

CSD
2.4%
SCHM
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

CSD
1.0%
SCHM
3.4%

Financial Services

CSD
0.1%
SCHM
11.1%

Energy

CSD

-

SCHM
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSD vs. SCHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CSD
CSD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSD Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHM
SCHM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SCHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CSD vs. SCHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSDSCHMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.25

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

2.49

+2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.08

8.79

+5.29

CSD vs. SCHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSD Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the SCHM Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSD and SCHM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSD vs. SCHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSD drawdown since its inception was -70.47%, which is greater than SCHM's maximum drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSD and SCHM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSDSCHMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.47%

-42.43%

-28.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.02%

-9.32%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.15%

-23.27%

-6.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.15%

-26.46%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.55%

-42.43%

-15.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.21%

-5.89%

-5.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.16%

-5.63%

-8.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

2.64%

+1.22%

Volatility

CSD vs. SCHM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) at 4.50%. This indicates that CSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSDSCHMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

4.50%

+1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.42%

13.07%

+6.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.67%

16.71%

+8.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.56%

19.68%

+3.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.97%

20.49%

+4.48%

CSD vs. SCHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHM's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSD vs. SCHM - Dividend Comparison

CSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than SCHM's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
0.12%0.16%0.17%0.51%0.86%0.73%0.99%1.08%0.99%0.60%1.62%2.61%
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
1.27%1.46%1.43%1.50%1.67%1.13%1.31%1.48%1.56%1.27%1.51%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSD and SCHM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSD has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to SCHM (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSD dropped -70.47% vs SCHM's -42.43%.

On 10-year performance, CSD leads with 13.22% vs 10.84% for SCHM. On fees, SCHM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHM has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CSD has performed better with a 13.22% return vs 10.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSD.

SCHM has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.12% for CSD.

CSD tracks S&P U.S. Spin-Off Index, while SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CSD and 0.04% for SCHM.

CSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSD and SCHM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer