PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSD vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CSD vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSD achieves a 47.93% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 9.16% return. Over the past 10 years, CSD has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 15.26%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 13.88% annualized return.


CSD

1D
0.87%
1M
8.78%
YTD
47.93%
6M
45.35%
1Y
82.98%
3Y*
39.20%
5Y*
18.83%
10Y*
15.26%

^GSPC

1D
-0.37%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
9.16%
6M
8.64%
1Y
25.22%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
13.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSD vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
47.93%21.58%27.61%23.77%-15.04%13.01%10.79%20.61%-17.82%20.64%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
9.16%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between CSD and ^GSPC is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2006

0.78

The correlation between CSD and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSD vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSD
CSD Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSD Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSD vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSD^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.37

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.36

2.78

+4.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.78

12.44

+16.34

CSD vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSD Sharpe Ratio is 3.39, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSD and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSD vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSD drawdown since its inception was -70.47%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSD and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSD^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.47%

-56.78%

-13.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.34%

-9.10%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.15%

-18.90%

-11.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.15%

-25.43%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.55%

-33.92%

-23.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.80%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.20%

-10.71%

-3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

2.03%

+0.86%

Volatility

CSD vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.67%. This indicates that CSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSD^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.09%

4.67%

+2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.54%

9.84%

+8.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.62%

12.50%

+12.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.40%

16.99%

+6.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.92%

18.11%

+6.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSD and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSD has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to ^GSPC (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSD dropped -70.47% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

CSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSD and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer