PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSD vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSD vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSD achieves a 36.18% return, which is significantly higher than SPMO's 22.35% return. Over the past 10 years, CSD has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 13.23%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.70% annualized return.


CSD

1D
2.14%
1M
-4.36%
6M
19.63%
YTD
36.18%
1Y
58.25%
3Y*
32.78%
5Y*
16.56%
10Y*
13.23%
ALL TIME*
10.04%

SPMO

1D
1.06%
1M
-3.63%
6M
21.38%
YTD
22.35%
1Y
29.45%
3Y*
38.16%
5Y*
20.19%
10Y*
19.70%
ALL TIME*
19.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.05M$2.15M$2.21M
$336.15M$337.86M$350.15M

CSD vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
36.18%21.58%27.61%23.77%-15.04%13.01%10.79%20.61%-17.82%20.64%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
22.35%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between CSD and SPMO is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.60

The correlation between CSD and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CSD vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSD
SPMO

Industrials

35.5%
11.2%

Technology

23.5%
53.7%

Healthcare

12.8%
6.9%

Utilities

7.3%
2.7%

Basic Materials

6.8%
1.9%

Communication Services

5.2%
7.4%

Real Estate

3.8%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

2.4%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
4.2%

Financial Services

0.1%
6.0%

Energy

-

3.3%

Industrials

CSD
35.5%
SPMO
11.2%

Technology

CSD
23.5%
SPMO
53.7%

Healthcare

CSD
12.8%
SPMO
6.9%

Utilities

CSD
7.3%
SPMO
2.7%

Basic Materials

CSD
6.8%
SPMO
1.9%

Communication Services

CSD
5.2%
SPMO
7.4%

Real Estate

CSD
3.8%
SPMO
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

CSD
2.4%
SPMO
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

CSD
1.0%
SPMO
4.2%

Financial Services

CSD
0.1%
SPMO
6.0%

Energy

CSD

-

SPMO
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSD vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CSD
CSD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CSD vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSDSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.24

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.87

1.89

+2.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.96

6.81

+8.15

CSD vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSD Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSD and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSD vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSD drawdown since its inception was -70.47%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSD and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSDSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.47%

-30.95%

-39.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.02%

-15.64%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.15%

-20.13%

-10.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.15%

-22.74%

-7.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.55%

-30.95%

-26.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.31%

-10.09%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.15%

-4.62%

-9.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

4.33%

-0.43%

Volatility

CSD vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) is 5.60%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.26%. This indicates that CSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSDSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

10.26%

-4.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.51%

21.52%

-2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.78%

23.86%

+1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.58%

20.61%

+2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.98%

20.94%

+4.04%

CSD vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSD vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

CSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than SPMO's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
0.12%0.16%0.17%0.51%0.86%0.73%0.99%1.08%0.99%0.60%1.62%2.61%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.72%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSD and SPMO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (10.26%) compared to CSD (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSD dropped -70.47% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 19.70% vs 13.23% for CSD. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, CSD has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 19.70% return vs 13.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSD.

SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.12% for CSD.

CSD is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. CSD tracks S&P U.S. Spin-Off Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CSD and 0.13% for SPMO.

CSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSD and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer