CSD vs. IYM
CSD (Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF) and IYM (iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSD is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P U.S. Spin-Off Index, while IYM is a Materials fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSD returned 15.26%/yr vs 11.29%/yr for IYM. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSD charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYM.
Performance
CSD vs. IYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSD achieves a 47.93% return, which is significantly higher than IYM's 20.88% return. Over the past 10 years, CSD has outperformed IYM with an annualized return of 15.26%, while IYM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.29% annualized return.
CSD
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 8.78%
- YTD
- 47.93%
- 6M
- 45.35%
- 1Y
- 82.98%
- 3Y*
- 39.20%
- 5Y*
- 18.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.26%
IYM
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 20.88%
- 6M
- 19.00%
- 1Y
- 37.99%
- 3Y*
- 14.87%
- 5Y*
- 9.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.29%
CSD vs. IYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSD Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF | 47.93% | 21.58% | 27.61% | 23.77% | -15.04% | 13.01% | 10.79% | 20.61% | -17.82% | 20.64% |
IYM iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF | 20.88% | 20.41% | -4.54% | 12.83% | -9.15% | 25.62% | 17.87% | 19.22% | -16.63% | 24.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSD and IYM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2006 | 0.73 |
The correlation between CSD and IYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
CSD vs. IYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CSD
IYM
Industrials
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
CSD
IYM
Technology
CSD
IYM
-
Healthcare
CSD
IYM
-
Basic Materials
CSD
IYM
Communication Services
CSD
IYM
-
Utilities
CSD
IYM
-
Consumer Cyclical
CSD
IYM
Real Estate
CSD
IYM
-
Financial Services
CSD
IYM
-
Consumer Defensive
CSD
-
IYM
-
Energy
CSD
-
IYM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSD vs. IYM — Risk / Return Rank
CSD
IYM
CSD vs. IYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSD | IYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.33 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.36 | 2.80 | +4.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.78 | 10.54 | +18.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSD vs. IYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSD drawdown since its inception was -70.47%, roughly equal to the maximum IYM drawdown of -67.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSD and IYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSD | IYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.47% | -67.78% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.34% | -13.61% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.15% | -23.62% | -6.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.15% | -29.94% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.55% | -42.76% | -14.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.07% | +2.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.20% | -11.44% | -2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 3.61% | -0.72% |
Volatility
CSD vs. IYM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) have volatilities of 7.09% and 7.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSD | IYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.09% | 7.05% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.54% | 15.71% | +2.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.62% | 19.58% | +5.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.40% | 20.48% | +2.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.92% | 21.78% | +3.14% |
CSD vs. IYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IYM's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSD vs. IYM - Dividend Comparison
CSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than IYM's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSD Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.17% | 0.51% | 0.86% | 0.73% | 0.99% | 1.08% | 0.99% | 0.60% | 1.62% | 2.61% |
IYM iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.65% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 1.48% | 1.39% | 2.08% | 1.68% | 1.43% | 1.47% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSD and IYM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSD has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to IYM (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSD dropped -70.47% vs IYM's -67.78%.
On 10-year performance, CSD leads with 15.26% vs 11.29% for IYM. On fees, IYM is cheaper at 0.42% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CSD has performed better with a 15.26% return vs 11.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYM is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSD.
IYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.11% for CSD.
CSD is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while IYM is Materials. CSD tracks S&P U.S. Spin-Off Index, while IYM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CSD and 0.42% for IYM.
CSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSD and IYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer