CSD vs. SRLN
CSD (Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF) and SRLN (SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSD is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P U.S. Spin-Off Index, while SRLN is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Leveraged Loan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSD returned 14.07%/yr vs 4.52%/yr for SRLN. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSD charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for SRLN.
Performance
CSD vs. SRLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSD achieves a 39.67% return, which is significantly higher than SRLN's 0.68% return. Over the past 10 years, CSD has outperformed SRLN with an annualized return of 14.07%, while SRLN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.52% annualized return.
CSD
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 8.22%
- YTD
- 39.67%
- 6M
- 39.98%
- 1Y
- 71.88%
- 3Y*
- 36.42%
- 5Y*
- 16.45%
- 10Y*
- 14.07%
SRLN
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 5.57%
- 3Y*
- 7.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.62%
- 10Y*
- 4.52%
CSD vs. SRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSD Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF | 39.67% | 21.58% | 27.61% | 23.77% | -15.04% | 13.01% | 10.79% | 20.61% | -17.82% | 20.64% |
SRLN SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF | 0.68% | 6.77% | 8.43% | 11.62% | -5.30% | 4.49% | 3.13% | 10.03% | -0.66% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSD and SRLN is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2013 | 0.43 |
The correlation between CSD and SRLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CSD vs. SRLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CSD
SRLN
Industrials
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
CSD
SRLN
Technology
CSD
SRLN
-
Healthcare
CSD
SRLN
-
Basic Materials
CSD
SRLN
-
Communication Services
CSD
SRLN
Utilities
CSD
SRLN
-
Real Estate
CSD
SRLN
-
Consumer Cyclical
CSD
SRLN
-
Financial Services
CSD
SRLN
-
Consumer Defensive
CSD
-
SRLN
-
Energy
CSD
-
SRLN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSD vs. SRLN — Risk / Return Rank
CSD
SRLN
CSD vs. SRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSD | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.44 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.37 | 1.71 | +4.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.98 | 6.35 | +18.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSD | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.03 | 1.94 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 1.19 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.75 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.70 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
CSD vs. SRLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSD drawdown since its inception was -70.47%, which is greater than SRLN's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSD and SRLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSD | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.47% | -22.29% | -48.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.34% | -3.26% | -8.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.15% | -4.26% | -25.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.15% | -7.93% | -22.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.55% | -22.29% | -35.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.12% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.23% | -1.10% | -13.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 0.88% | +2.01% |
Volatility
CSD vs. SRLN - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) at 0.44%. This indicates that CSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSD | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 0.44% | +5.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.29% | 2.64% | +15.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.87% | 2.89% | +20.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.26% | 3.91% | +19.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.83% | 6.06% | +18.77% |
CSD vs. SRLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than SRLN's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSD vs. SRLN - Dividend Comparison
CSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than SRLN's 7.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSD Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.17% | 0.51% | 0.86% | 0.73% | 0.99% | 1.08% | 0.99% | 0.60% | 1.62% | 2.61% |
SRLN SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF | 7.49% | 7.67% | 8.58% | 8.44% | 5.72% | 4.45% | 4.91% | 5.39% | 4.98% | 4.01% | 3.94% | 4.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSD and SRLN have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSD has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to SRLN (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSD dropped -70.47% vs SRLN's -22.29%.
On 10-year performance, CSD leads with 14.07% vs 4.52% for SRLN. On fees, CSD is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, SRLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CSD has performed better with a 14.07% return vs 4.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSD is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SRLN.
SRLN has the higher dividend yield at 7.49%, compared with 0.11% for CSD.
CSD is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SRLN is High Yield Bonds. CSD tracks S&P U.S. Spin-Off Index, while SRLN tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Leveraged Loan Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CSD and 0.70% for SRLN.
CSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSD and SRLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer