CSBG.NEO vs. ATMP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP).

CSBG.NEO and ATMP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSBG.NEO is an actively managed fund by CIBC. It was launched on Jun 18, 2021. ATMP is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. It was launched on Mar 13, 2013.

Performance

CSBG.NEO vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CSBG.NEO vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CSBG.NEO CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.17%	1.22%	1.69%	2.60%
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN	22.64%	2.08%	50.65%	18.90%	36.55%	7.04%

Different Trading Currencies

CSBG.NEO is traded in CAD, while ATMP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ATMP values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

CSBG.NEO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: 0.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ATMP

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: 4.83%
• YTD: 22.64%
• 6M: 22.46%
• 1Y: 14.25%
• 3Y*: 30.27%
• 5Y*: 29.27%
• 10Y*: 14.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSBG.NEO vs. ATMP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSBG.NEO has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than ATMP's 0.95% expense ratio.

ATMP

Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN

CSBG.NEO

CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF

Return for Risk

CSBG.NEO vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATMP

ATMP Risk / Return Rank: 50
ATMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
ATMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
ATMP Omega Ratio Rank: 57
ATMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
ATMP Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSBG.NEO vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSBG.NEO	ATMP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.10	0.42	+0.68

Correlation

The correlation between CSBG.NEO and ATMP is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CSBG.NEO vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison

CSBG.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ATMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSBG.NEO CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.16%	1.21%	1.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN	4.51%	5.14%	4.72%	5.62%	5.50%	5.89%	8.71%	6.86%	6.51%	5.56%	5.47%	6.30%

Drawdowns

CSBG.NEO vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSBG.NEO drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum ATMP drawdown of -67.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSBG.NEO and ATMP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSBG.NEO	ATMP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-73.72%	+73.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	0.00%	-15.11%	+15.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.98%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-70.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.41%	+2.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-17.50%	+17.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	5.80%	-5.80%

Volatility

CSBG.NEO vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO) is 0.00%, while Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that CSBG.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSBG.NEO	ATMP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	4.33%	-4.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.00%	9.39%	-9.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	18.20%	-18.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.30%	20.17%	-18.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.30%	25.38%	-24.08%