CRWG vs. IBIG

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

CRWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF) and IBIG (iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRWG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while IBIG is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2030 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. CRWG is actively managed, while IBIG is passively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRWG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIG.

Performance

CRWG vs. IBIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG) and iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWG achieves a -39.74% return, which is significantly lower than IBIG's 1.44% return.

CRWG

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: -62.61%
• 6M: -68.72%
• YTD: -39.74%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIG

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.61%
• 6M: 1.48%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 1Y: 3.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWG vs. IBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF	-39.74%	-81.81%
IBIG iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF	1.44%	1.06%

Correlation

The correlation between CRWG and IBIG is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025	0.01

Return for Risk

CRWG vs. IBIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBIG

IBIG Risk / Return Rank: 50
IBIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
IBIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
IBIG Omega Ratio Rank: 43
IBIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
IBIG Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWG vs. IBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG) and iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRWG	IBIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.23	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.83	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.22	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.40	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.58	—

Drawdowns

CRWG vs. IBIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWG drawdown since its inception was -91.06%, which is greater than IBIG's maximum drawdown of -3.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWG and IBIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRWG	IBIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.06%	-3.21%	-87.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.00%	-0.63%	-90.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-70.15%	-0.77%	-69.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.49%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRWG	IBIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.97%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.90%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	187.70%	2.64%	+185.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	187.70%	4.24%	+183.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	187.70%	4.24%	+183.46%

CRWG vs. IBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRWG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIG's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRWG vs. IBIG - Dividend Comparison

CRWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.27%, more than IBIG's 5.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF	12.27%	7.39%	0.00%	0.00%
IBIG iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF	5.50%	4.70%	4.15%	0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRWG and IBIG in my portfolio?

CRWG and IBIG have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRWG or IBIG?

On fees, IBIG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRWG or IBIG?

IBIG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CRWG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRWG or IBIG?

CRWG has the higher dividend yield at 12.27%, compared with 5.50% for IBIG.

What is the main difference between CRWG and IBIG?

CRWG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IBIG is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRWG and 0.10% for IBIG.