PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIG vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIG vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIG achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.37% return.


IBIG

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
1.64%
6M
1.42%
1Y
5.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
2.37%
6M
2.51%
1Y
4.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIG vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBIG
iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF
1.64%7.90%2.60%4.26%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.37%4.96%5.25%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between IBIG and IBIC is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between IBIG and IBIC has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIG vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIG
IBIG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IBIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIG vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBIGIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

2.24

-0.88

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

17.27

-13.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.68

67.45

-54.77

IBIG vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 5.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIG and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBIGIBICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

5.05

-3.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.43

3.49

-2.06

Drawdowns

IBIG vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIG drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIG and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIGIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-0.90%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.35%

-0.26%

-1.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.13%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-0.10%

-0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

0.07%

+0.33%

Volatility

IBIG vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) has a higher volatility of 0.62% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.33%. This indicates that IBIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIGIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

0.33%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.70%

0.67%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62%

0.90%

+1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.29%

1.58%

+2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.29%

1.58%

+2.71%

IBIG vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBIG and IBIC have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIG vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

IBIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%
IBIG
iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF
3.89%4.70%4.15%0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBIG and IBIC have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIG has higher volatility (0.62%) compared to IBIC (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIG dropped -3.21% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, IBIG leads with 5.02% vs 4.54% for IBIC. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIG has performed better with a 5.02% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIG and IBIC have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

IBIG has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 3.59% for IBIC.

IBIG tracks ICE 2030 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIG and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer