PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIG vs. VTP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIG vs. VTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IBIG having a 0.74% return and VTP slightly higher at 0.75%.


IBIG

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.44%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.89%
1Y
3.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VTP

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
0.75%
6M
0.95%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIG vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBIG and VTP is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.87

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIG vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIG
IBIG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IBIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

VTP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIG vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBIGVTPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.74

IBIG vs. VTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBIG vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIG drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, which is greater than VTP's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIG and VTP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIGVTPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-1.92%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-1.09%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-0.52%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

Volatility

IBIG vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIGVTPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66%

3.34%

-0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.28%

3.34%

+0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.28%

3.34%

+0.94%

IBIG vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBIG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIG vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison

IBIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than VTP's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIG
iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF
3.92%4.70%4.15%0.78%
VTP
Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
1.62%1.56%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBIG and VTP have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIG.

IBIG has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 1.62% for VTP.

IBIG tracks ICE 2030 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIG and 0.05% for VTP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIG and VTP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer