IBIG vs. VTP
IBIG (iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF) and VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - IBIG tracks the ICE 2030 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index while VTP tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBIG charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VTP.
Performance
IBIG vs. VTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IBIG having a 1.74% return and VTP slightly lower at 1.70%.
IBIG
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 4.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTP
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 1.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIG vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBIG iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF | 1.74% | 2.22% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.70% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIG and VTP is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIG vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank
IBIG
VTP
IBIG vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBIG | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.99 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.15 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBIG | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 1.37 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
IBIG vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIG drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, which is greater than VTP's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIG and VTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIG | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -1.92% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -0.15% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.77% | -0.52% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.40% | — | — |
Volatility
IBIG vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIG | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.61% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62% | 3.27% | -0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.29% | 3.27% | +1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.29% | 3.27% | +1.02% |
IBIG vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBIG vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison
IBIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than VTP's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIG iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF | 3.88% | 4.70% | 4.15% | 0.78% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.61% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIG and VTP have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIG.
IBIG has the higher dividend yield at 3.88%, compared with 1.61% for VTP.
IBIG tracks ICE 2030 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIG and 0.05% for VTP.
Find the right allocation for IBIG and VTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer