PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIG vs. IBII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIG vs. IBII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF (IBII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIG achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly higher than IBII's 0.86% return.


IBIG

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.01%
6M
0.48%
YTD
1.16%
1Y
2.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.57%

IBII

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.47%
6M
0.10%
YTD
0.86%
1Y
2.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$653.65K$533.93K$728.16K
$334.80K$323.00K$347.99K

IBIG vs. IBII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBIG
iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF
1.16%7.90%2.60%4.26%
IBII
iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF
0.86%8.65%1.21%4.85%

Correlation

The correlation between IBIG and IBII is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023

0.95

The correlation between IBIG and IBII has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIG vs. IBII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IBIG
IBIG Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IBIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIG Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

IBII
IBII Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IBII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBII Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBII Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IBII Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBII Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IBIG vs. IBII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF (IBII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBIGIBIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.16

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

1.52

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.47

4.19

+1.28

IBIG vs. IBII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the IBII Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIG and IBII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBIG vs. IBII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIG drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, smaller than the maximum IBII drawdown of -4.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIG and IBII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIGIBIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-4.65%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.35%

-1.98%

+0.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-1.40%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-1.12%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

0.72%

-0.20%

Volatility

IBIG vs. IBII - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) is 0.52%, while iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF (IBII) has a volatility of 0.78%. This indicates that IBIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIGIBIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.52%

0.78%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.88%

2.58%

-0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58%

3.41%

-0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.22%

5.35%

-1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.22%

5.35%

-1.13%

IBIG vs. IBII - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBIG and IBII have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIG vs. IBII - Dividend Comparison

IBIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than IBII's 5.21% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIG
iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF
5.52%4.70%4.15%0.78%
IBII
iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF
5.21%4.80%4.76%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IBIG and IBII move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IBII has higher volatility (0.78%) compared to IBIG (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIG dropped -3.21% vs IBII's -4.65%.

On 1-year performance, IBIG leads with 2.25% vs 2.21% for IBII. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, IBIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIG has performed better with a 2.25% return vs 2.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIG and IBII have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

IBIG has the higher dividend yield at 5.52%, compared with 5.21% for IBII.

IBIG tracks ICE 2030 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while IBII tracks ICE 2032 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index.

IBIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIG and IBII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer