PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BABX vs. MSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BABX vs. MSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABX achieves a -28.75% return, which is significantly higher than MSTX's -47.35% return.


BABX

1D
8.45%
1M
-3.53%
YTD
-28.75%
6M
-41.65%
1Y
2.60%
3Y*
8.73%
5Y*
10Y*

MSTX

1D
-18.07%
1M
-44.62%
YTD
-47.35%
6M
-64.81%
1Y
-94.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BABX vs. MSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BABX
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF
-28.75%123.85%3.21%
MSTX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF
-47.35%-89.06%137.37%

Correlation

The correlation between BABX and MSTX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2024

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BABX vs. MSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABX
BABX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
BABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTX
MSTX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABX vs. MSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BABXMSTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.03

-0.68

+0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.75

-1.90

+2.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.80

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

-0.98

+1.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.11

-1.26

+1.37

BABX vs. MSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BABX Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is higher than the MSTX Sharpe Ratio of -0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BABX and MSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BABXMSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

-0.68

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

-0.40

+0.40

Drawdowns

BABX vs. MSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABX drawdown since its inception was -70.62%, smaller than the maximum MSTX drawdown of -98.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABX and MSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BABXMSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.62%

-98.66%

+28.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.86%

-96.62%

+31.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.78%

-98.38%

+38.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.22%

-69.88%

+24.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.08%

75.01%

-38.93%

Volatility

BABX vs. MSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) is 28.99%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) has a volatility of 39.23%. This indicates that BABX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BABXMSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.99%

39.23%

-10.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.19%

111.76%

-53.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.35%

139.45%

-52.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.11%

167.29%

-84.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.11%

167.29%

-84.18%

BABX vs. MSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BABX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTX's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

BABX vs. MSTX - Dividend Comparison

Neither BABX nor MSTX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
BABX
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSTX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%41.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


BABX and MSTX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTX has higher volatility (39.23%) compared to BABX (28.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABX dropped -70.62% vs MSTX's -98.66%.

On 1-year performance, BABX leads with 2.60% vs -94.32% for MSTX. On fees, BABX is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, BABX has been the lower-risk option at 28.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BABX has performed better with a 2.60% return vs -94.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BABX is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for MSTX.

BABX and MSTX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for BABX and 1.29% for MSTX.

BABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BABX and MSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer